By : Saifedean Ammous, author of the Standard, appeared on the . Ammous spoke on several subjects, including .
What Would It Take To Kill bitcoin?
Livera spoke to the fact that a full government ban on would make people aware of the fact that they have little control over the money in their bank accounts. Ammous responded, in part:
People think that if government were to just pass a law that bans , then goes away and they get to laugh at us, and that’s the end of the story. I think it’s actually the other way around. […] The more restrictive governments are against , that means the more restrictive they generally are financially, and the worse their monetary policies are.
So if people are trying to get into and governments are saying, ‘If you buy , we’re going to throw you in jail,’ then number one, we can tell, obviously that people have a good reason to be buying , otherwise they wouldn’t be risking going to jail. And that government is trying to stop them from it, and the fact that it is trying to stop them means that government is imposing financial restrictions on them.
And so that ultimately is ’s use case. ’s use case is moving money around the world without having to report to your government. And so the more governments create restrictions like this, the more problems they create, the worse their monetary policy is, and that’s not just, you know, the governments of the west. […] It applies all over the world.
bitcoin Bans Have a Streisand Effect
Ammous believes that laws banning have a positive impact on it. The unrestricted nature of transactions means that repression has .
A blanket ban on will have the opposite effect, according to the economist. | Source: Shutterstock
Laws are just one way governments might try to kill . As with any technological force, you can’t rightly legislate it away. is as much a philosophical movement as it is a financial upheaval and, indeed, a judgment on institutions writ large.
Want to Kill bitcoin? Be Better
Ammous says that if governments want to kill , they need to compete with it.
The notion that you’re just going to kill the economic incentive that exists for people to use by passing a law that criminalizes it, I think is fanciful – I don’t see that happening. […] The way for governments to kill would be to do the exact opposite of what the no-coiners want and the exact opposite of what the Keynesians and the people who hate think would work. The way for them to kill is for them to make the economic incentive to use irrelevant. To make the demand for using go away at the source. They need to offer a technology that is better than – that can obviate the need for .
The long-time crypto analyst elucidates this viewpoint more in a recent paper issue of his newsletter, which costs .
Listen to the full podcast below.
Published at Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:08:04 +0000
