January 26, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Crypto-Loving US Senate Candidate Forced to Return $130,000 Bitcoin Donation

Crypto-loving us senate candidate forced to return $130,000 bitcoin donation

Crypto-Loving US Senate Candidate Forced to Return $130,000 Bitcoin Donation


Austin petersen
Advertisement

Open Positions at CCN: Full Time and Part Time Journalists Wanted.

US Senate candidate Austin Petersen received a $130,000 bitcoin donation but was forced to return it due to federal regulations governing campaign contributions.

Petersen, a Republican who is hoping to unseat incumbent Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill during the mid-term election in November, said that an enthusiastic supporter attempted to donate $130,276 worth of bitcoins (~20 BTC) over the weekend, but his campaign had to refuse it since Federal Elections Commission (FEC) regulations restrict individual contributions to $5,400 per year

The candidate, a dark horse in the GOP primary who has nevertheless polled well against McCaskill, encouraged the enthusiastic supporter to start a political action committee (PAC), an organization which can use an unlimited amount of funds to promote candidates as long as it files reports with elections regulators and does not coordinate directly with political campaigns.

As CCN reported, Petersen, a self-described libertarian conservative, began accepting bitcoin donations last year through BitPay’s cryptocurrency donations platform. At the time, he told CCN that he believes cryptocurrency “represents the future of American creativity and American liberty.”

bitcoin’s disruptive influence is just what our financial system needs at this time. For too long, the federal government has had exclusive control over currency, stymying competition and growth by falsely limiting consumer choice — a fact we would all be aware of were the Federal Reserve subject to the same kind of audits privately-held companies are. Cryptocurrency represents the future of American creativity and American liberty, and I’m delighted to accept campaign donations in this form.”

Notably, this wasn’t the first time that Petersen has been forced to return a large bitcoin donation. He told CCN that his campaign has twice been forced to refuse donations of approximately $250,000 for exceeding the FEC limit on individual campaign contributions.

In February, Petersen accepted the largest single bitcoin donation in federal election history. The 0.284 BTC donation was valued at $4,500 at the time, making it $900 below the individual limit.

Austin Petersen Image from Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Follow us on Telegram.
Advertisement

Published at Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:13:13 +0000

bitcoin Elections

Previous Article

COMSA新ニュースで爆上げなるか!?【仮想通貨急騰】

Next Article

Crypto Markets See $13 Bln Price Spike in One Hour, Despite Negative BIS Report

You might be interested in …

Consultant Service Intern

Consultant Service Intern Our main programs include the AI Course (Big Data, Blockchain, Deep. Is building the University of San Jose (USJ) now, and located in San…. Gosvea Inc.San Jose, CA 95112 From Indeed 1 […]

Adam Back: Blockstream ‘Has No Patents Related To SegWit’

Blockstream CEO Adam Back has refuted claims by Swedish Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge that the company “has patents in SegWit.”


 Pirate Party’s Falkvinge: Blockstream SegWit Support Driven By Patents

In a Twitter response Monday, Back stated Blockstream “does not have any patents, patent applications, provisional patent applications, or anything similar, related to segwit.”

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Falkvinge, who is a staunch supporter of bigger blocks proposed by rival scaling solution campaigners bitcoin Unlimited, had earlier Monday released a dedicated post on his website arguing Blockstream’s SegWit support was for its own interests.

“Based on Blockstream’s behavior in the bitcoin community, I have become absolutely certain that Segwit contains patents that Blockstream and/or their owners have planned to use offensively,” he wrote.

Falkvinge Accuses Blockstream Of ‘Goalpost Moving’

The post accuses Blockstream of “classic goalpost moving” and employing behavior that “only makes sense” under a patent battle.

Falkvinge continues:

…Based on Blockstream’s behavior, I can say with dead certainty that I’ve seen this exact behavior many times in the past, and it’s always when somebody has a dual set of reasons – one for presentation and palate and another that drives the actual course of action.

Back’s Twitter retort appears to be lifted from previous comments on Reddit left by core developer Greg Maxwell.Maxwell

“As is the case for other major protocol features, the bitcoin developers worked carefully to not create patent complications. Segwit was a large-scale collaboration across the community, which included people who work for Blockstream among its many contributors,” he continued.

Moreover, because the public disclosure of segwit was more than a year ago, we could not apply for patents now.

Maxwell reiterated that Falkvinge had previously made similar allegations, which he had addressed separately.

“In short, Rick Falkvinge’s allegations are entirely without merit and are supported by nothing more than pure speculation which had already been debunked,” he concluded.

A Clash Of Ideals?

Falkvinge meanwhile has remained bullish on bitcoin publicly, telling RT in February he expected bitcoin could take over up to 10% of the foreign exchange market.

In his post, however, a clear distinction is drawn between the classic bitcoin ethos and that of Blockstream.

The owners of Blockstream are the classic financial institutions […] that have everything to lose from cryptocurrency gaining ground,” he wrote.

The conclusion is unescapable (sic) here: Blockstream’s constant goalpost shifting has had the underlying goal to have Blockstream’s owners effectively own bitcoin through patent encumbrance.

What do you think about Rick Falkvinge’s claims about Blockstream? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Twitter

The post Adam Back: Blockstream ‘Has No Patents Related To SegWit’ appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Bitcoin long is overcrowded trade

Bitcoin Long is Overcrowded Trade

bitcoin Long is Overcrowded Trade Sentiment is king in much of crypto and foreign exchange trading. This is mainly due to the fact that hedge funds, banks, and other financial institutions own all of the […]