September 11, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Craig ‘Satoshi’ Wright Claims to Have Filed 666 Blockchain Patents

Craig ‘satoshi’ wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents

Craig ‘Satoshi’ Wright Claims to Have Filed 666 Blockchain Patents

Craig ‘satoshi’ wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents

The race to file blockchain patents has accelerated lately with one specific firm, Nchain Holdings, attempting to capture hundreds of distributed ledger-related patents. According to reports, self-proclaimed Satoshi – Craig Wright – and his Nchain business claim to have filed 666 patent applications to date, capturing a gigantic portfolio of intellectual property.

Also Read: Jeff Garzik Subpoenaed in Kleiman Bitcoin Lawsuit Against Craig Wright

So-Called Satoshi’s Quest to Patent the Blockchain

The notorious Craig Wright, a man who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, is continuing his effort to obtain hundreds of cryptocurrency and blockchain-related patents. Wright is the chief scientist of Nchain but is best known for his attempts to prove he created bitcoin over a decade ago.

Craig 'satoshi' wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents
Craig Wright, the chief scientist of Nchain Holdings, has filed for hundreds of patents over the years. Wright has also claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto on numerous occasions.

Nchain has been relentlessly filing for digital currency and blockchain patents. According to a report published on March 7, Craig Wright and Nchain Holdings have applied for a total of 666 patents and they proudly announced this watershed moment after reaching this symbolic number.

“In fact, Craig Wright and Nchhain have so many patent applications that we have now reached a fiendish milestone,” explains Nchain executive Jimmy Nguyen in the recent blog post. He continued:

Last month, Nchain filed patent application number 666 — That’s right — the number of the Beast, Satan himself.

Despite Nguyen’s claim, it’s hard to confirm the exact number of patents filed in Wright and Nchain’s name. The last report concerning Wright and Nchain’s patent acquisition was published and researched by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The report states that since August 2017 the organization has found roughly 155 patent applications filed by Wright. Nchain has filed and been granted numerous patents over the last few years, to the extent that the relatively unknown company seems to have more patents than most financial incumbents. This includes top blockchain patent holders such as Alibaba, Bank of America, Mastercard, IBM, and Accenture.

Craig 'satoshi' wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents
Both Wright and Nchain executive Jimmy Nguyen speak publicly about these patent filings on a regular basis.

Moreover, Nchain’s blockchain patent filings can be found throughout many patent and trademark offices across the globe in countries like the U.K., U.S., Japan, and China. The intellectual property requests include concepts like a blockchain counting system and a method for use in secure voting, an operating system for blockchain-based Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices, and an agent-based Turing complete feedback system built within a blockchain network. Those concepts are just scratching the surface when it comes to patent filings found peppered throughout the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and the U.K.’s Intellectual Property Office.

Craig 'satoshi' wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents

Technology Protection or Weapons for Patent Wars?

The large amount of filings begs the question: Why does Nchain Holdings and the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto need so many patents? According to Nchain, intellectual property (IP) is being obtained to protect the technology. Back in July of 2018, when Mastercard acquired a patent that facilitates anonymous cryptocurrency transactions, Coingeek’s Calvin Ayre stated: “This is precisely why Nchain has to go the patent route … to protect technology they invent to release open source.” In Nguyen’s latest blog post, the executive said that Nchain will “encourage companies to build on BSV where it will be free to use many of Nchain’s IP assets.”

“With hard work and great expense, Nchain has produced what we believe is the world’s largest and best quality blockchain patent portfolio in the world,” Nguyen’s blog post details. “Nchain will use its IP portfolio for good, not evil, to help the bitcoin SV ecosystem.”

Many cryptocurrency users detest the idea of using patents within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, which is traditionally dominated by open source projects. With Visa, Mastercard, Bank of America, and Nchain, the range of patent applications lodged today is quite wide. Many cryptocurrency fans believe that patents are part of a strategic move to threaten developers, startups and smaller firms for years to come. Some digital asset proponents also believe the community should rally together to stop patent filers and large corporations from stealing prior art. A good majority of bitcoiners are not too worried about these patents for the specific reason that bitcoin is prior art and technology that cannot be patented.

Craig 'satoshi' wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents

However, some individuals have voiced concern over Wright and Nchain’s patent filing due to his dubious claims of being bitcoin’s inventor. The greater bitcoin community and most crypto fans in general do not believe Wright is Satoshi as he has been accused of plagiarism and condemned for creating phony blog posts, PGP keys, and allegedly doctoring many contracts and emails. However, skeptics like libertarian author Wendy McElroy believe that the “ignorance of the audience” and “knowing how to game the system” may maximize Wright’s chance of winning.

What do you think about Nchain and Craig Wright’s attempt to gather a vast collection of patents for the company’s IP portfolio? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.


Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Lens.org, WIPO.


At OhioBitcoin.com there’s a bunch of free helpful services. For instance, have you seen our Tools page? You can even look up the exchange rate for a transaction in the past. Or calculate the value of your current holdings. Or create a paper wallet. And much more.

Tags in this story
666 patents, Accenture, Alibaba, Bank of America, Bitcoin Inventor, blockchain patents, BSV, Craig Wright, IBM, Intellectual Property, Inventions, ip, Jimmy Nguyen, MasterCard, N-Featured, nChain, Nchain Holdings, Patents, Satoshi, WIPO

Craig ‘satoshi’ wright claims to have filed 666 blockchain patents
Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Redman has written thousands of articles for news.bitcoin.com about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Published at Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:10:03 +0000

Previous Article

Bitcoin Short the 100 EMA has the answer 3400 here we come

Next Article

Bitcoin’s hash rate records 4-month high as confidence in BTC mining grows

You might be interested in …

EOS достиг абсолютного максимума и продолжил ралли

ForkLog EOS достиг абсолютного максимума и продолжил ралли Криптовалюта EOS продемонстрировала стремительное ралли на этой неделе, преодолев предыдущий максимум на отметке $18.50. Так, ее среднестатистический курс вырос более чем на 80%, оставив всех участников ТОП-10 […]

Morgan Stanley Analyst: True Price of Bitcoin Could Be Zero

In a recent report sent out to clients, Morgan Stanley analyst James Faucette cautioned that the “true” value of bitcoin might actually be zero.


Zero. Zip. Nada.

The report, titled bitcoin Decrypted, discussed the difficulty in ascribing value to the digital currency, noting that it behaves like neither a currency nor a store-of-value commodity like gold, silver, etc… Examining several key factors, Faucette points out:

  • bitcoin can’t be valued as a currency because it has no associated interest rate;
  • It may be likened to digital gold but, unlike gold itself, which is used in electronics, jewelry, etc.., bitcoin has no inherent use*;
  • While it is technically a payment network, bitcoin is difficult to scale and charges no transaction fee*;
  • bitcoin’s average daily trade volume over the last 30 days is only $3 billion* compared to $5.4 trillion in the FX market;
  • The estimated daily purchase volume for bitcoin is less than $300 million compared to Visa’s $17 billion

Bitcoin acceptance among Top 500 eCommerce Retailers

All of these facts, according to Faucette, underscore the fact that the digital currency has “virtually no acceptance, and shrinking.” In fact, he provides a handy chart (above) to illustrate his statement. Because of this, he maintains that “If nobody accepts the technology for payment then the value would be 0.”

Hold On There, Speed…

I hate to burst your bubble, Mr. Faucette, but some of your facts are…shall we say…less than factual. Mind you, I am no financial analyst, but then you don’t need to be to pick out these errors.

FACT 1bitcoin has no inherent use

This one is a little tricky to refute, but I’ll give it a go. Playing devil’s advocate, let’s say that bitcoin as a cryptocurrency has no inherent use. It’s underlying architecture, the blockchain, has a wide range of applications. I know…”But blockchain and bitcoin are two separate things…” True, but without the blockchain, we wouldn’t have bitcoin to begin with, so one could conceivably argue that – in this instance – they are two sides of the same coin.

bitcoin has other uses too – especially in a socioeconomic sense. Consider the current economic conditions in Venezuela and Zimbabwe. These people have been utterly failed by their respective governments. Inflation is through the roof, their native currency has about as much value as one-ply toilet paper, and people – families – are starving. So where are they turning? bitcoin. People are mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies so that they can survive. That’s pretty useful if you ask me.

Starving Venezuelans Turn to Bitcoin Mining in Desperation

FACT 2bitcoin charges no transaction fee

Um…hello? There is absolutely a transaction fee, and right now, we’re paying it out the wazoo. It’s part of those “scalability issues” you mention in your research report. Now, if by transaction fee, you mean a centralized service provider collecting a fee that goes into its own coffers, then I guess maybe you’re technically correct, but you’ve still missed the point. Kind of like tech support at a software company whose name will not be mentioned here.

FACT 3bitcoin’s average trade volume over the last 30 days is only $3 billion

What rock have you been living under? Go look at the historical data for the last 30 days on CoinMarketCap. It’s okay. I’ll wait. Second column from the right. The one labeled Volume. If you take the average of all 30 days, as of this writing, it works out to $11.8 billion – just a wee bit more than your $3 billion estimate.

Bitcoin average 24hr trade volume

I respect your experience and your financial acumen, Mr. Faucette, and it even looks like we both believe in the same old adage, “Forewarned is forearmed,” but if you’re arming your clients with inaccurate information, what purpose does it serve?

What do you think of Faucette’s claims? Could the true value of bitcoin actually be zero or is this just more wharrgarbl? Let us know in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Morgan Stanley, Reuters

The post Morgan Stanley Analyst: True Price of Bitcoin Could Be Zero appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.