October 24, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

CoinMarketCap Rehauls Exchange Listings in Response to Controversies Over Skewed Volumes

Coinmarketcap rehauls exchange listings in response to controversies over skewed volumes

CoinMarketCap Rehauls Exchange Listings in Response to Controversies Over Skewed Volumes

Coinmarketcap rehauls exchange listings in response to controversies over skewed volumes

Crypto price tracker and exchange rankings site CoinMarketCap.com (CMC) is making major changes to its exchange listings method in light of concerns over skewed trade volume data, according to an official announcement July 19.

As of July 16, the site has now removed the minimum volume requirements that it had been using to limit the number of exchanges listed on the site.

According to CMC, this represents the first measure among others that will be phased in to address widespread concerns about the integrity of trade volume figures on exchanges.

Although CMC says it transparently aggregates volume data based on access to the exchanges’ APIs, it acknowledges that several factors are emerging that may compromise its accuracy.

These include a new “transaction fee mining” model, recently adopted by some exchanges, that reimburses transaction fees in the form of native exchange tokens. As CMC notes, this can pump volumes by making it profitable for users to simply trade back and forth to accrue more tokens, a phenomena compounded if bots are used to automate the action.

CMC also mentions the extremely low fee models that are used to incentivize trading, noting that they often fluctuate and can be tiered by account type and transaction volume — a variable that remains opaque to both CMC and the users who consult its data.

Lastly, the site notes that artificial volumes and so-called “wash trading” remain pervasive on certain exchanges, which often rely on “market making services or bots” to trade native exchange tokens purely to maintain a minimum level of volume.

Acknowledging the “complexity” of the problem, CMC has begun to introduce more ways for users to filter volume data and take variations in fee models or other parameters into account. The site will soon introduce new metrics, such as 7-day and 30-day listings, to allow for better evaluation of volume consistency.

CMC closely eyes debates and controversies in the crypto space, most recently acting to remove a bitcoin.com link from its bitcoin page amid heated allegations that the site was misleading customers into buying Bitcoin Cash (BCH) instead of Bitcoin (BTC).

In January, the site controversially opted to remove South Korean exchanges from its listings at a time when the Korean “crypto frenzy” was causing a notable price premium on certain coins, skewing the site’s average figures.

The recently rebranded five-year old CMC has seen stratospheric growth, reporting over 60 million unique visits this year through May.

Published at Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:20:00 +0000

bitcoin

Previous Article

War Robots New Mk2 Maxed Out Bulwark Ember Gameplay – Best Setup – WR

Next Article

Patientory The future of digitized healthcare

You might be interested in …

Alex Tapscott’s Nextblock Global Receives Major Backlash Prior to Public Offering

Things have gone from bad to worse for Alex Tapscott this past week. Several of his projects have received a lot of scrutiny. Moreover, there are some allegations which have to be rectified as well. Nextblock Global, the company owned by Alex Tapscott, will invest in companies and projects focusing on ICOs. However, the list of advisors for this company is mostly fake. Not a big surprise, but it is still rather worrisome.

Most people in the cryptocurrency world know the name Alex Tapscott. He is a well-known author and Canadian investors. However, his latest business venture raises a lot more questions than answers. Nextblock Global is a very dubious business model, to say the least. Not because of the investing angle, but everything else about it seems pretty fake. Especially the list of alleged advisors contains names which aren’t even associated with this venture.

Trouble Ahead for Nextblock Global

Some of those names include Andreas Antonopoulos and Dmitry Buterin. It is unclear why their names are on the list of advisors, to begin with. Neither of these gentlemen is even remotely connected to this new venture. There are some other names on the page which may also be completely fake, including Vinny Lingham and Kathryn Haun. It is disconcerting to see these names listed on a site they don’t even want to be associated with. It is a common tactic among semi-scammy ICO ventures, though.

The big question is why Alex Tapscott made such a grave mistake. It is evident these names were included to make the company more legitimate. However, it is unclear if this is his doing or someone else’s. The official explanation is how they were “listed in a draft version”. Even so, these names shouldn’t be there unless they agree to be a part of it. A weak explanation, to say the very least. This doesn’t bode well for the future of Nextblock Global either.

It is evident this whole ordeal will cause a lot of heated debate. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has rebuked its underwriting of the Nextblock Global public offering. This is the only logical decision as long as these “issues” are still being discussed. It is a very strange and potentially unfortunate turn of events. Whether or not there was any foul play involved, will always remain a question. It won’t do the reputation of Alex Tapscott any favors either right now. Then again, if this is an error, it should all blow over pretty soon.

Header image courtesy of Shutterstock

The post Alex Tapscott’s Nextblock Global Receives Major Backlash Prior to Public Offering appeared first on NEWSBTC.