Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M
posted a photo:
from bitcoin Magazine | Get 3% OFF On #GenesisMining The Largest Cloud Mining Service Provider With #PromoCode: "jywAkr" (without the quotes) Website:
YouTube: litecoin Sentiment Data Suggest Downside for bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin and Ripple Subscribe to DailyFX: https://www.youtube.com/DailyFXNews?sub_confirmation=1 -Visit DailyFX: https://www.dailyfx.com Welcome to DailyFX where subscribers get access to actionable and authoritativ… more info…
zerohedge.com / by Tyler Durden / Apr 7, 2017
Over the past several months, one of the proposals floated on this website to explain the strange collapse in volatility at a time when uncertainty has soared, was the so-called “negative convexity” gamma trade, demonstrated best by the in mid-February, according to which traders buying vol has led to dealers offsetting these purchases with more than proportional purchases of offsetting underlying assets as a hedge, in the process pushing sending realized – and thus implied – volatility even lower.
Today, the WSJ picks up on this idea, and looks at a possible “feedback loop” scenario in which selling of volatility leads to even more selling of volatility, resulting in a market in which the VIX appears oddly disconnected from prevailing nervous sentiment. According to the WSJ’s Jon Sindreau, the theory, advanced by several money managers, bankers and analysts, “describes a type of feedback loop in which calm markets make selling insurance against sharp swings in asset prices profitable, which makes the markets more calm, which then makes selling insurance yet more attractive. And on and on.”
The post appeared first on .