September 26, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Central Bank Digital Currencies Are a Trojan Horse for Bitcoin

Central bank digital currencies are a trojan horse for bitcoin

Central Bank Digital Currencies Are a Trojan Horse for Bitcoin

Central bank digital currencies are a trojan horse for bitcoin

Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and Bitcoin could scarcely be more different. One is permissioned, the other permissionless; one centralized, the other decentralized; one is censorable, the other censorship-resistant. Despite their dissimilarities, CBDCs might just be the best driver yet for Bitcoin adoption.

Also read: Mobile Gifting Platform Swych Announces Cryptocurrency Support

CBDCs Are the Best Thing That Could Have Happened to bitcoin

When JP Morgan unveiled its eponymous stablecoin on Feb. 14, the sound of sniggering could be heard throughout the cryptosphere. Aside from the irony given CEO Jamie Dimon’s previous Bitcoin bashing, there was the notion, advanced by benighted mainstream media, that Jpmcoin, which runs on a permissioned ledger and settles transactions between JP Morgan banks only, presented a threat to Bitcoin.

“JPMorgan Just Killed the Bitcoin Dream” screamed one headline, prompting further sniggers from the crypto community. CBDCs and cryptocurrencies exist on parallel tracks that do not cross. The former serves as a type of stable digital currency that is issued and wholly controlled by banks. CBDCs share some characteristics of cryptocurrencies in facilitating fast and low-cost cross-border transfers, but the similarities end there.

The greatest threat these instruments present is not to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, but rather to slow and inefficient settlement systems such as Swift. Last year, the former chair of the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Sheila Bair, said CBDCs could have “severely negative consequences” for the “bank-dominated payments system.” CBDCs, including stablecoins such as Jpmcoin, may deleteriously affect the incumbent financial system as well as Ripple’s native cryptocurrency, but their impact on Bitcoin is likely to be positive.

How CBDCs Are Bullish for bitcoin

The emergence of central bank digital currencies serves to legitimize and normalize digital currencies as the future of money. Within this broad context, any attention they receive helps to put further distance between Bitcoin and the tired “drugs, speculation, and tax evasion” narratives. Should CBDCs gain traction, however, people will quickly discover that they offer few improvements over the current financial system and come bearing several distinct disadvantages.

Digital currencies transferred via permissioned ledgers or pseudo-blockchains facilitate real-time tracking of customer spending at all times. Anyone deemed to be persona non grata, or even suspected of transacting with people deemed undesirables, is liable to have their funds frozen and account suspended. These provisions are already in place with the legacy financial system, but CBDCs will amplify the powers available to governments and regulators, with sophisticated forensics tools providing unprecedented insights into the spending habits and social behaviors of citizens.

In a world of CBDCs, there will be no place to hide and no freedom to transact without being authorized by the powers that be. It’s easy to imagine a dystopian future, based on China’s social credit system, in which citizens are billed for their healthcare and screened for employment based on their purchase history and social circle. The rise of central bank digital currencies will also bring benefits, of course, such as lowering the cost and time involved with wiring money abroad. Given the notoriously siloed nature of financial houses, however, it would be optimistic to expect CBDCs to operate globally. Just like Jpmcoin, it is likely that there will be little to no interoperability with CBDCs, preventing these digital currencies from even realizing their limited potential.

As a rising tide raises all ships, increased adoption of digital currencies benefits Bitcoin. When users of central bank digital currencies tire of their limited functionality, lack of privacy, and susceptibility to censorship, they’ll come searching for an alternative means of sending money cheaply, quickly and permissonlessly and they’ll find Bitcoin. CBDCs make for poor digital currencies but are a great Trojan horse for Bitcoin.

Do you think CBDCs will benefit or threaten Bitcoin? Let us know in the comments section below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock.


Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.

Kai Sedgwick

Kai’s been playing with words for a living since 2009 and bought his first bitcoin at $19. It’s long gone. He’s previously written white papers for blockchain startups and is especially interested in P2P exchanges and DNMs.

Published at Sat, 16 Feb 2019 15:10:19 +0000

Previous Article

Central Bank Digital Currencies Are a Trojan Horse for Bitcoin

Next Article

Central Bank Digital Currencies Are a Trojan Horse for Bitcoin

You might be interested in …

Stay Away! Denmark Bank Chief Calls Bitcoin ‘Deadly’

The governor of Denmark’s central bank has issued an unexpectedly harsh warning about bitcoin, describing it as “deadly.”


‘bitcoin Arena’ Not Enough To Persude Central Bank

In an interview with state media outlet DR, Lars Rohde emphatically told citizens to “stay away” from bitcoin, becoming a further figure to compare the cryptocurrency to 17-century Tulip Mania.

“You have to stay away. It is deadly,” he said.

Denmark

“It’s an effective way of playing around. So if you do not like casinos, you’ve got a good alternative.”

While banking figures lambasting bitcoin as a bubble remains hardly unusual, Rohde’s perspective marks a particularly vivid case in point.

Authorities’ inability to create a steady narrative on cryptocurrency regulation has become a noticeable phenomenon in recent months, Russia and South Korea leading the trend of contradictory statements.

Such episodes have occurred even in permissive jurisdictions where cryptocurrency interaction is both comparatively advanced as officially sanctioned.

Denmark became a prime example just last week, as bitcoin Suisse announced its three-year sponsorship of major league hockey team Rungsted Seier Capital.

As part of the arrangement, Rungsted’s top player is due to receive his salary in bitcoin, while the team’s home stadium will be renamed “bitcoin Arena.”

Rohde: bitcoin Is ‘A Bubble Out Of Control’

In official circles, however, it appears such enthusiasm is yet to be shared.

“I see bitcoin like Tulip Mania, a bubble out of control,” Rohde continued.

…It is the responsibility of the individual. And if we are to do anything, then it is consumer protection to say that it is entirely off your own bat and you should not come complaining to us if it goes wrong.

As bitcoin approached $20,000, several bank warnings surfaced late last week.

Stephen S. Poloz, governor of the Bank of Canada, went as far as to say the “noise” around cryptocurrency in general “kept him awake at night,” while similarly reiterating the lack of control investors have over the value of their holdings.

“…It’s often forgotten that the cash provided by a central bank is the only truly risk-free means of payment,” he told audience members at a talk in Toronto.

What do you think about Lars Rohde’s perspective on bitcoin? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock,nationalbanken.dk

The post Stay Away! Denmark Bank Chief Calls Bitcoin ‘Deadly’ appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Bitcoin Core 0.17.0 Released

bitcoin Core 0.17.0 Released bitcoin Core version 0.17.0 is now available for download containing many new features as well as bug fixes and other improvements. For a complete list of changes, please see the release […]