November 3, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Bloomberg Shows Complete Misunderstanding of JPM Coin Crediting It with Bitcoin Price Rise

Bloomberg shows complete misunderstanding of jpm coin crediting it with bitcoin price rise

Bloomberg Shows Complete Misunderstanding of JPM Coin Crediting It with Bitcoin Price Rise

Photo: david martin / flickr

Photo: David Martin / Flickr

Following the news of February 14 about JP Morgan‘s launching its new cryptocurrency dubbed JPM Coin, a lot of controversial responses from crypto community continue to appear on the Web. Some crypto enthusiasts have met the news with promising expectations, while others have taken it with mistrust. However, the most unexpectedly outrageous response came from Bloomberg, the well-known financial media outlet, which reported that the launch of JPM Coin is boosting Bitcoin price.

At the time of JP Morgan’s announcement, the crypto market cap was actually down by 0.6%. A few days after, the crypto market started to go up again, especially bitcoin (BTC) which price surged slightly above $4,000 USD. According to Bloomberg, it was a “delayed boost” caused by JPM token. Ironically, the outlet did not mention in the report other factors which affected the surge, such as the Lightning Network products, which are getting stronger every day.

The statement is more than hillarious and first of all demonstrates total misunderstanding of what JPM Coin is. In fact, JPM Coin is not even a cryptocurrency. It represents itself a centralized digital token designed to be used internally. Although it does use the blockchain technology, it does not mean that it has something in common with bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency.

Moreover, while in common understanding a cryptocurrency should be decentralized, JPM Coin is centralized and relies on a trusted third party, not to mention that JP Morgan’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, is a well-known bitcoin’s hater, who considers it as a crap. Essentially, JPM Coin is a stablecoin, which is developed more to settle payments between clients than having its own free market as bitcoin does. In other words, JPM Coin embodies everything that bitcoin is struggling against.

However, the Bloomberg’s ironic report is only the latest one to hit the headlines. It is not the only one outlet to spread the wrong statements around the Internet. Baron’s laughable “JPMorgan Just Killed the bitcoin Dream” or The Washington Examiner’s “JPMorgan’s Alternative to bitcoin” are among other examples of complete misunderstanding of the new cryptocurrency’s true nature:

As we can see, while being presented as the first native cryptocurrency issued by a major bank, JPM Coin is a cryptocurrency in name only. The bank will use it to instantly settle payments between clients. Further, it could be used to digitize securities like stocks and bonds. So there is definitely nothing to be afraid of for bitcoin or any other crypto.

Published at Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:42:06 +0000

Previous Article

Bitcoin- new stable coin, that cost 4000 USD

Next Article

PR: KuCoin Launches Platform 2.0 With Advanced API and Various Order Types

You might be interested in …

Report: Only ‘7.929 BTC’ Funded Terrorism Since 2015

Coin Center CEO Jerry Brito has said it is “time to assess” cryptocurrency’s exposure to terrorism in light of the US Congress moving to investigate links.


Brito: Community ‘Shouldn’t Be Concerned’ By Congress

Highlighting preliminary findings from the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), which he describes as “by and large excellent,” Brito said the community should learn not to fear scrutiny from regulators.

“News reports today that Congress may soon commission a study assessing the link between terrorism and virtual currencies have generated concern within the cryptocurrency community, but they shouldn’t,” he began.

No one should want cryptocurrency networks to be used to finance terrorism, and an assessment of how they may be used and how to prevent that use should be welcome.

The announcement from Congress comes as bitcoin remains in the headlines globally due to the ongoing ransomware-based cyberattack.

While its perpetrators’ plan to get rich appears to have stalled, the level of disruption caused has nonetheless placed bitcoin at the heart of mainstream internet businesses’ latest headache.

Only ‘Anecdotal Evidence’ Of Crypto Terror Financing

The CNAS meanwhile clearly segregates terrorism from comparatively innocuous cyber attacks of this nature.

“Currently […] there is no more than anecdotal evidence that terrorist groups have used virtual currencies to support themselves,” Brito highlights a remark from the report, which he notes is “very important.”

“…There is time to develop an appropriate response to the possibility,” he continued.

bitcoin value

The possibility remains precisely that, CNAS confirms, with the overwhelming choice among organized terrorist groups and even individuals regarding funds transfer still being the “legacy financial system,” as Brito describes it.

“They still find it possible to circumvent global rules governing terrorist financing with suficient (sic) ease and frequency that using VCs is unnecessary,” the report continues.

They exploit incomplete implementation of regulatory requirements and global standards at banks, use unlicensed and undersupervised (sic) money services businesses (MSBs), or simply cart around cash.

A timeline supplied in the CNAS report highlighting “selected” incidents of terrorist financing only produces 7.929 BTC as a total from 2015 – 2017.

This, a commentator responded, is less even than “the cost of commissioning” the report itself.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Congress Commission Will Not Surprise

In terms of regulation, Brito considers the Congressional findings will likely “reach the same conclusions” as CNAS regarding regulatory next moves. These revolve around taking a measured approach to financial innovation without overwhelming “compliance burdens.”

“Financial policymakers should consider how to actively support beneficial financial technology development, particularly when it can bring virtual currency and new payment technology platforms successfully into the regulated financial sphere,” he quotes the report.

The international community has traditionally been at odds over the ‘real’ extent of cryptocurrency penetration among terrorist actors.

The ostensible need to guard against terrorism has formed grounds for regulatory moves from sources such as the European Union, whose plans to link cryptocurrency wallets to holders’ names in a database is still causing controversy.

What do you think about Jerry Brito’s angle on cryptocurrency in terrorism? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of coincenter.org, Shutterstock

The post Report: Only ‘7.929 BTC’ Funded Terrorism Since 2015 appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Blockchain-Enabled Exchange Amercanex Joins Cannabis Platform Helix TCS

Blockchain-Enabled Exchange Amercanex Joins Cannabis Platform Helix TCS On February 6, 2019, Helix TCS announced that it had purchased Amercanex International Exchange, which operates an electronic trading platform for the legal distribution and purchasing of […]