July 28, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Blockchain Remittances Face Efficiency Hurdle, Says Taiwan Central Bank

Blockchain remittances face efficiency hurdle, says taiwan central bank

Blockchain Remittances Face Efficiency Hurdle, Says Taiwan Central Bank

Blockchain remittances face efficiency hurdle, says taiwan central bank

Blockchain systems for interbank clearance and remittance may not be as efficient as centralized systems just yet, according to a report released by the Central Bank of Taiwan.

Announced by the bank’s new governor Yang Chin-long at a press event Thursday, the report outlined various explorations currently being conducted by the island’s central banking authority into financial technology, including a proof-of-concept utilizing distributed ledger in interbank remittance.

Collaborating on the effort are members of academia and the Taiwan Clearing House (TWNCH), an authority that handles financial product settlements among financial institutions, under supervision of the central bank.

However, the initial results suggest that the distributed system, so far, is not as efficient as the existing centralized Automated Clearing House (ACH) system, developed by the TWNCH.

While two different tests using the blockchain PoC were able to process 4 and 26 transactions per second, respectively, such speeds are significantly less than the 2,700 transactions per second managed by the ACH system.

Furthermore, the reliability of the blockchain platform could also be an obstacle, the report said:

“In addition, the testing result shows there are problems of confidential information leak and malfunctions in individual nodes.”

The central bank said, though, that blockchain technology is still at an early stage and is developing rapidly, and it doubled down on its commitment to widen efforts to conduct more testing with the clearing house and financial institutions. Yang previously promised to boost blockchain adoption in Taiwan during his tenure in his February inauguration speech.

In other news, the Yang remarked Thursday, according to a local report, that bitcoin may be the “biggest bubble in history.” He has previously said that cryptocurrencies have diverted from their intended purpose in payments towards becoming a mere tool for speculation.

Taiwan dollar image via Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Published at Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:00:51 +0000

Use Cases & Verticals[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]

Previous Article

$8K? Bitcoin Under Pressure After Rejection at Key Hurdle

Next Article

10 Best & Worst Performing Altcoins of ‘Crypto Winter 2018’

You might be interested in …

Coinbase to launch over-the-counter block trades, says report

Coinbase to Launch Over-the-Counter Block Trades, Says Report

Coinbase to Launch Over-the-Counter Block Trades, Says Report Slippage in cryptocurrency trading has prompted Coinbase, the largest digital currency exchange, to introduce over-the-counter (OTC) block trades, according to a report. The move will allow traders […]

BIP 91 Has Locked In. Here’s What That Means (and What It Does Not)

BIP91.jpg

It looks as if bitcoin is getting Segregated Witness.

Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 91 (BIP 91) just locked in. Up to 90 percent of all hash power signaled support for this soft fork, which implies miners intend, in turn, to trigger Segregated Witness (SegWit) activation. By extension, this should make BIP 148 obsolete and August 1 a non-event.

But SegWit is not certain. In fact, on a technical level, SegWit is not any closer to activation at all.

BIP 91

Segregated Witness, defined by BIP 141, locks in if at least 95 percent of miners (by hash power) signal support for the upgrade within a two-week difficulty period. To do so, miners need to embed a piece of data called “bit 1” in the blocks they mine.

Importantly, this is technically the only way for SegWit to activate right now. And this threshold has not yet been met.

But there are alternative strategies to try and trigger this threshold “indirectly” — like BIP 91.

BIP 91 is a bitcoin Improvement Proposal proposed by Bitmain Warranty engineer James Hilliard. It is compatible with the New York Agreement and backed by a number of bitcoin companies and mining pools. It is also compatible with BIP 148, another strategy to trigger the BIP 141 threshold indirectly.

Miners have been signaling support for BIP 91 over the past couple of days through another piece of data, “bit 4.” Once 269 blocks within a 336-block window included bit 4, this BIP 91 soft fork locks in. This threshold was just met.

This means that after another 336 blocks, a little over two days from now, all BIP 91–compatible nodes will reject any block that doesn’t include bit 1.

As long as a majority of hash power enforces BIP 91, this majority should eventually control the longest valid chain according to all bitcoin nodes. And as this chain consists of bit 1 SegWit-signaling blocks only, it would in turn lock in SegWit on all SegWit-ready nodes by mid-August. SegWit itself should then be live on the bitcoin network after a two-week “grace period” by the end of that month.

If all goes well …

What Could Go Wrong?

Although well over 80 percent of hash power has signaled bit 4 for BIP 91 lock in, this doesn’t actually guarantee anything. Most importantly, it doesn’t in itself mean that these miners will signal bit 1 for SegWit.

Indeed, so far, most miners don’t. Currently, the proportion of miners signaling bit 1 is still far lower than BIP 91 activation would suggest. It is even lower than 50 percent.

Moreover, BIP 91 will probably be enforced by hardly any economically relevant nodes; that is, nodes operated by users that accept bitcoins as payment. Almost no bitcoin users on the network recognize BIP 91 or its bit 4 signaling at all, and will therefore continue to accept blocks with or without bit 1.

BIP 91 will, instead, be enforced by hash power alone. This in turn means that a majority of miners (by hash power) could back out of BIP 91 with little more than reputational damage. They could continue to mine blocks that do not signal bit 1, even after BIP 91 activates in a few days. As long as these miners are in a majority, they will still control the longest valid chain: valid according to most miners, and valid to most users.

Furthermore, any minority of miners and the few nodes that do enforce the BIP 91 soft fork would then be forked off the bitcoin network. In a few days from now, these miners would mine (on top of) blocks that almost only they themselves would care for, while most of the rest of the entire bitcoin network would completely ignore them.

With this week’s bit 4 signaling, a majority of miners have effectively made a statement that they intend to start to activate the SegWit soft fork within a couple of days. But for now, that’s really all it is: a very public, blockchain-based statement of intent.

Actual SegWit activation should start next week, if miners stick to their stated intent.

The post BIP 91 Has Locked In. Here’s What That Means (and What It Does Not) appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

OmiseGO Close To Completing Plasma Integration

Ethereum World News OmiseGO Close To Completing Plasma Integration OmiseGO, one of the most popular projects on the Ethereum network, recently announced important advances in Plasma development and integration. In the monthly Community Update, the […]