July 15, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

BitMEX Set to Compete with Bitcoin Core Developing Its Own Bitcoin Software Client

CoinSpeaker
BitMEX Set to Compete with bitcoin Core Developing Its Own bitcoin Software Client

This week the BitMEX team has published a lengthy post in their official blog on the issue of competition with the bitcoin Core software project. Having analyzed the capacities and development of the project under consideration, the BitMEX team has found clear differences between the ways of competeing with it.

One of the main conclusions is that belief in bitcoin Core’s exclusive ability to affect Bitcoin is a misconception, so, even if something happens to bitcoin Core, if it is hacked or deactivated, it won’t have a huge impact on bitcoin.

Types of competing projects

Researches has defined the main approaches to competing with the Core project and united them in three main categories.

The first type defined is competition between chains. In this very case we are speaking about projects that are trying to change the consensus rules. For example, soft and hard forks can be included into this category. Nevertheless, such an approach can be considered to be rather risky as due to it the existing coin may be splitted into two separate chains.

This method can be implemented only with active support of a wide audience or through introduction of a new coin, otherwise, the existing threats may negatively influence the stability of the coin leading to the lack of confidence in it.

The second approach is competition between independent implementations. It presupposes a new trial to implement bitcoin excluding the usage of the core code. This approach includes utilizing the potential and opportunities of another programming language. As the first rype, this one is also rather risky as it may result in an accidental chain split in case even of a slight difference in approaches to the consensus behavior.

But it’s worth mentioning that this great number of clients is a very important benefit from the perspective of omitting/fixing bugs that were found in dominant implementation.

There is also the third type mentioned. All other competing software project that do not work neither with the consensus rules changes nor with the codebase reimplementation are included into this group. According to BitMEX, these projects are not so risky and controversial as those that are described above.

BitMEX new client

To compete with bitcoin Core, BitMex Research has announced its own new client called bitcoin BitMEX Research. There are no plans to introduce consensus changes that could lead to a strong necessity to conduct a hard fork or to try to repeat the implementation the protocol through rewriting the codebase.

The company offers a software fork of bitcoin Core which can be included into the third group of “Other competing software projects” and is rather safe as it doesn’t have any risks that can be brought to the network with the projects of other two types.

The post BitMEX Set to Compete with Bitcoin Core Developing Its Own Bitcoin Software Client appeared first on CoinSpeaker.

bitcoin News
Order Speed Analysis Reveals the Fastest Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Order speed analysis reveals the fastest cryptocurrency exchanges

When you’re trading digital assets, speed matters — particularly so if you’re engaged in high-frequency trading, when every millisecond counts. Executing orders a fraction of a second ahead of the market can mean the difference between profit and loss. New data reveals which cryptocurrency exchanges are the fastest — and which are struggling to keep up.

Also read: Cypherpunk Essentials: A Beginner’s Guide to Crypto Privacy

Speed Analysis Shows Significant
Variation Between Platforms

Data provided by Deribit shows marked differences in the speed at which six leading cryptocurrency exchanges fulfill orders. The derivatives exchange looked at three major spot exchanges: Bitfinex, Binance and Coinbase. It also examined three major crypto derivatives exchanges: Bitmex, Okex and its own platform. It should be noted, however, that Deribit has an incentive to share its analysis, as it recorded the fastest order execution in tests.

The most liquid pair on each exchange was tested to determine the time it takes to add a limit order and execute a market order. Most of the exchanges that were tested failed to achieve either task in under 10 milliseconds, with Okex faring the worst.

Order speed analysis reveals the fastest cryptocurrency exchangesSpeed analysis for Bitmex

Order speed doesn’t normally concern retail investors, who aren’t reliant on split-second execution when buying and selling assets. However, it matters a lot to professional traders, particularly on Wall Street, and increasingly in the cryptocurrency markets, too. On derivatives exchanges such as Bitmex and Deribit, where cryptocurrencies such as BTC can be traded with up to 100x leverage, timing is everything. And for trading strategies dependent on a fast response to market news, order speed can prove crucial. Many financial brokers base their entire business model around high-frequency trading, relying on algorithmic trading aided by low latency, high speeds and high order-to-trade ratios.

Order speed analysis reveals the fastest cryptocurrency exchangesLogarithmic results for all six exchanges tested
Derivatives Exchanges Are Quicker Than
Their Conventional Counterparts

Deribit has invited interested parties to download its speed analysis data and inspect it for themselves, to verify its findings. Describing its methodology, the platform wrote:

We measured the time from the initial request until the confirmation that the order had been placed. To compensate for network delays outside the control of the exchange, we recorded the latency for a trivial API request. The duration for these requests was subtracted from the duration of the order requests. The remaining time is assumed to be the true execution
time for a request.

The exchange claimed that it conducted all of the tests on machines that were situated as close as possible to the exchanges in question. The results were as follows:

Binance’s average order execution delay was 37.2 milliseconds, with 0.1 percent of orders executed within 10 milliseconds.
Bitfinex’s average order execution delay was 156 milliseconds, with 0 percent of orders executed within 10 milliseconds.
Bitmex’s average order execution delay was 1.11 seconds, with 13.4 percent of orders executed within 10 milliseconds.
Coinbase’s average order execution delay was 33.0 milliseconds, with 0.2 percent of orders executed within 10 milliseconds.
Deribit’s average order execution delay was 6.1 milliseconds, with 89.6 percent of orders executed within 10 milliseconds.
Okex’s average order execution delay was 127 milliseconds, with 0 percent of orders executed within 10 milliseconds.

Order speed analysis reveals the fastest cryptocurrency exchangesSpeed analysis results for Deribit

Competition between exchanges is fierce, especially among those that offer the high risk and reward cocktail that is derivatives. While there’s a lot more to successful margin trading than speed, its significance is sure to grow as competition intensifies and traders are forced to fight for that all-important edge.

Do you think speed matters on derivatives exchanges such as Bitmex and Deribit? Let us know in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.

The post Order Speed Analysis Reveals the Fastest Cryptocurrency Exchanges appeared first on Bitcoin News.

Previous Article

Korean Startup M2O Gets Patent for Tokenizing Bonus Points

Next Article

Monero 0.13.0 “Beryllium Bullet” Release

You might be interested in …

Exclusive: Discussion With Australian Blockchain Startup Power Ledger Co-Founder Jemma Green

Australian Solar Startler Power Ledger thinks that Blockchain Technology can stimulate the energy industry to more efficiency, reducing both distributor waste and consumer costs.

Since finalizing its initial offer of 34 million Australian Dollars (ICO), the company has participated in several blockchain studies, including one financed by the Australian government.

Power Ledger was co-founded by Dr. Jemma Green, a researcher at Curtin University in Western Australia. Before setting up his Power Ledger, Dr. Green worked as an investment banker at the JP Morgan subsidiary in London, where he also received two postgraduate degrees from Cambridge University in the field of sustainability. Dr. Green was also freshly elected as Deputy Mayor of Perth, Western Australia.

Dr. Green spoke to the CCN about the challenges of disrupting the energy industry with blockchain technology, as well as about the launch of the first ICO in Australia.

CCN: Dr. Green, you have a charming summary, at least. What prompted you to leave the investment banking industry and start developing blockchain-based solutions for sustainable energy?

 Jemma Green: Halfway through JP Morgan I looked encompassing the office and noticed that there were no recycling facilities. I glanced at it and found that 500,000 pounds a year could be saved from their enlightenment, so I threw this concept to COO in Europe, and he said well. Three months later we launched recycling boxes, and I was very excited until I saw that people were recycling in their office boxes. So I formed a secondary phase called “Bin The Bin,” and I shifted the ugliest person in the office.

Something overturned my mind at that moment, and I found that renewable energies are more exciting than my daily work, so I decided to pursue the study of sustainability.

CCN: What will be the role that blockchain platforms, such as Power Ledger, will play in the future of the energy industry?

Jemma Green: Blockchain platforms will support to facilitate our future energy distribution with the better return on investment for solar panels and batteries. It also allows for a low-cost, low-carbon energy system that sets the client in the first place.

Clients will have more authority over their functionalities, as well as a better knowledge of their energy profiles.

CCN: What are the vast barriers that Power Ledger and other energy companies face when trying to decentralize the energy industry?

Jemma Green: There are a lot of adjustments in the field of the energy industry, so it is indeed an obstacle. The most challenging part is finding a way to work within the rules, while disturbing sector – it is a balancing act, but one that we managed through partnerships.

By saying this, there are limited incentives in specific markets for a market that needs to innovate on a platform like the Power Ledger.There is also a massive educational process that has to happen so that purchasers understand their choices when it comes to energy.

CCN: You had an ICO / TGE with great success, mainly since you were the first Australian startup to keep one. What was the most challenging about this experience?

Jemma Green: It was very hard for our resources. I was simultaneously juggling the business while I was also spending 12 hours a day at ICO. Being a startup, everyone has been and still is using multiple hats, so we steadily manage how to spend the best time, making sure that we do not differ too much from our long-term goals.

It’s also hard because you do not need to outsource anything. So we’d be in our telegram chat until 1 am and the dawn break that runs the business. It was imperative for us, as executives, to be involved in the community throughout the ICO process, introducing new customers and leading the company.

CCN: In retrospect, occurs there any aspect of the ICO / TGE you would like to have treated uniquely, or advice that you would give to other companies that are trying to launch token sales?

Jemma Green: Through all the madness, sometimes we were caught reactive preferably than proactive with our official answers. For example, we would be in trenches on our telegram chat!. Talking with each person instead of being strategic and using the voice of the company and getting to it.

We also had crew members radiated all over the globe, which was very good to reach, but brought its challenges. I would advise other ICO’s to prioritize the establishment of an internal connection both in the location and in the discipline.

In retrospect, these things were easy to change, but the reality is that we could not have gotten a better result than what we have achieved.

The post Exclusive: Discussion With Australian Blockchain Startup Power Ledger Co-Founder Jemma Green appeared first on Crypto News 24/7 – Bitcoin News.