Bitfinex Releases IEO Whitepaper, Claims $404 Million Net Profit in 2018
Under fire cryptocurrency exchange, Bitfinex, has released a claiming they turned a $404 million net profit in 2018, as by Bloomberg on May 9, 2019. The information provided is not backed by evidence as the exchange only revealed select data from their financial statements.
Bitfinex Addresses Insolvency Claims
In a whitepaper issued about their new IEO offering, , Bitfinex has rubbished claims of alleged insolvency by claiming they were able to turn a huge profit in 2018. The exchange has been in constant controversy for the last two weeks after the New York State Attorney General against them and the Arizona State Attorney General filed for a on Crypto Capital linked businessman, Reginald Fowler.
The exchange revealed a consolidated gross profit of $418.2 million for iFinex Ltd, meaning their total expenses amounted to a mere $14.2 million. Dividends paid out to shareholders was roughly $262 million in 2018; a 6.5 percent increase from 2017.
iFinex is raising a billion dollars in their IEO which is roughly the same amount the NYAG alleges they lost to payment processor Crypto Capital. In the document, they claim to utilize 95 percent of recovered funds to burn tokens they issue.
In order to entice potential investors, Bitfinex is interesting a special equity clause in their tokens. With a tradable Recovery Right Token (RRT), holders of the token will be able to convert their Bitfinex tokens into shares of iFinex.
Significant Pressure Mounting
After the FBI a portion of their funds, Bitfinex has gone into disaster recovery mode to prevent collateral damage from the events. The IEO and their cold wallet sell off is sufficient evidence to claim that Bitfinex is lacking liquidity. Fiat withdrawal claims are piling up on the exchange as customers do not want to buy for a – they would rather get their cash; this led to CoinMarketCap excluding Bitfinex’s weight on bitcoin price from their calculation.
Bitfinex is attempting to realign its public image, which has been under fire since the launch of Tether in 2017. The whitepaper is likely to be a tactic for them to convince the crypto community they are doing their best to work with authorities and mitigate legal risk while raising capital to better the operational efficiency.
It’s going to be a long and tough road for Bitfinex to repair it’s s reputation with people already comparing the current situation to pre-bankruptcy Mt. Gox.
The hard fork part of the is scheduled to take place within about two weeks. This incompatible protocol rule change is set to increase bitcoin’s block weight limit, to allow for more transactions on the network — if everyone adopts the change. Otherwise, it will create a new blockchain and currency that be considered to be “bitcoin.” The list of signatories of this agreement includes several of the largest bitcoin startups and mining pools that, together, claim to represent a majority of users and hash power. Yet, it is far from clear that this part of proposal really has much support outside of these signatories. Most of bitcoin’s , a significant number of , some , as well as suggest otherwise.
And now, a growing list of international bitcoin communities is putting out public statements against the SegWit2x hard fork as well.
— the largest and longest-running bitcoin meetup in South Korea with over 1700 members — was the first user community to put out a on SegWit2x. More precisely, in their own words, the group voiced its “staunch opposition to this November’s proposed hardfork.”
In its statement, the Seoul bitcoin Meetup places emphasis on the manner in which the agreement was made. Typically, changes to the bitcoin protocol go through the Improvement Proposal (BIP) process where it is peer reviewed by developers across the ecosystem, whereas SegWit2x went through the New York Agreement, which was forged at an invite-only meeting among about a dozen company executives.
The Seoul Meetup states:
If a select group of CEOs and investors, no matter how benevolent their intentions, can unilaterally make decisions about the consensus rules without public comment and force these changes upon the network regardless of overall consensus, then bitcoin will have lost the properties that make it valuable in the first place.
Additionally, the Seoul bitcoin Meetup argues that the hard fork is needlessly risky without offering sufficient benefits to warrant the risk. It also takes issue with the of SegWit2x developers not to implement strong replay protection.
On the same day as the Seoul Meetup Group, the Munich meetup group also put out a public statement against the SegWit2x hard fork. This meetup group consists of over 2000 members — though only several dozen of them actually engaged in the vote whether or not the statement against the SegWit2x hard fork would be accepted. This itself was spread via on social media.
In its statement, the bitcoin Munich meetup explains it opposes the SegWit2x hard fork in part because of technical concerns:
Another doubling of the block size so quickly after SegWit seems hasty and might cause further mining centralization.
The statement further argues that a hard fork requires more and better preparation and should include more improvements from the, and it endorses bitcoin Core as “the true bitcoin client.”
The biggest user community also published the longest against the SegWit2x hard fork so far. A combined effort between a significant group of Argentinian and Brazilian users and companies, published on October 17,2017, voiced “their deepest concerns over the upcoming November hardfork as mandated by the so-called New York Agreement (NYA), also known as SegWit2x (S2X).”
Not unlike other critics of the hard fork, emphasis was placed on the process that led to the SegWit2x agreement:
The very nature of an ‘agreement’ between a few parties in a decentralized consensus protocol can be interpreted as an aggression against the network.
Similarly, the statement addresses the lack of transparency from SegWit2x proponents, criticizing the notion of a “political compromise instead of a technical upgrade” and the “consensus imposition instead of consensus building.”
Other points of concern include the lack of replay protection, the rushed nature of the hard fork, misleading statements by SegWit2x proponents and much more.
The Israeli bitcoin Association is a non-profit organization that promotes bitcoin and similar technologies in Israel, with an open membership. On October 24, 2017, this association put out its own on the SegWit2x hard fork.
Slightly different from several of the other statements, the Israeli bitcoin Association emphasizes the right of anyone to fork bitcoin and create a new cryptocurrency. That naturally includes SegWit2x proponents.
But importantly, the association adds:
A protocol change in the currency holding the name ‘bitcoin’, especially one requiring a hard fork, requires overwhelming consensus. The SegWit2x hard fork does not in any way enjoy such consensus, and while this remains the case we cannot refer to the resulting currency as ‘bitcoin.’
The SegWit2x currency will instead be referred to as “‘Bitcoin2x.’ ‘SegWit2x coins,’ BT2, B2X, S2X or any other distinctive term that the industry will adopt.”
The Hong Kong bitcoin Community / bitcoin Association of Hong Kong
The Hong Kong bitcoin Community in general, and the bitcoin Association of Hong Kong specifically, put out against SegWit2x on October 25, 2017.
While technically separate statements, both voice their concern about the lack of consensus for the hard fork. The Hong Kong bitcoin Community — a group of Hong Kong–based companies — states that “the lack of enthusiastic support for this fork among the community is striking.” The association — which mostly exists to promote bitcoin in Hong Kong — states that “the proponents of the hardfork should kindly ask the bitcoin community to support them and then only proceed with the hardfork if there is widespread community support.”
Additionally, the Hong Kong groups speak out against the lack of replay protection in the SegWit2x fork.
Due to the combination of both a lack of consensus across the community and a lack of strong replay protection, we consider SegWit2x a reckless endeavor that will cause disruption and harm to the ecosystem.
The Italian bitcoin community, more specifically a group of companies, meetups, lobbying groups and other organizations, put out a against SegWit2x on October 31, 2017.
The statement is largely inspired by an earlier by the Italian blockchain research lab , which rejected SegWit2x as “an attempt to perform a political takeover of bitcoin.”
The statement by the broader Italian bitcoin community is a bit more compact, but nonetheless touches on many of the familiar points of criticism regarding the SegWit2x hard fork. It reads:
The opposition is especially strong against any action of this kind that could cause huge inconveniences for service providers and serious confusion for users, potentially leading to financial losses: unilateral attempts to appropriate bitcoin name, logo or “ticker”, attempts to mislead light-clients and SPV wallets on alternative networks not explicitly chosen by them, attempts to launch new coins in a way which leave users vulnerable to “replay attacks” or address format confusion, attempts to attack the network with a temporary hashing-power majority in order to create disruptive reorgs or to slow down the normal activity.
Meanwhile, the French-speaking bitcoin communities are voicing their concerns with the SegWit2x hard fork through a. It is currently signed by over 1300 people and counting.
The (French) text that accompanies the petition is mostly inspired by and based on the statement published by the Seoul bitcoin Meetup. Like that statement, this petition emphasizes concerns about the manner in which the agreement was forged, while also noting the lack of replay protection and other problems.
Additionally, the petition includes a call to action to find alternatives for the companies that signed onto and continue to support the SegWit2x hard fork:
We would suggest avoiding the use of services of companies that support the NYA, and we hope to substitute them with alternative solutions.
Are they any more user communities that have put out statements against or in favor of the SegWit2x hard fork? Let me know at aaron@bitcoinmagazine.com.
Learn how to trade Forex & Cryptocurrency, bitcoin. Free Event Birmingham Learn how to trade Forex & Cryptocurrency, bitcoin. Free Event Birmingham Topics covered include: Situation in regards to our investment's and multiplying our current […]
