February 16, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

BITCOIN – WHY IT IS HARD FOR BREAK UP 3600 – 3900$ ???

Bitcoin - why it is hard for break up 3600 - 3900$???

BITCOIN – WHY IT IS HARD FOR BREAK UP 3600 – 3900$ ???

Bitcoin - why it is hard for break up 3600 - 3900$???

Hello guys , xuanhaimmoer is here for help and support all you

Just like habit in everyday so today I make this chart also an update for new actions of bitcoin but more important I willing to declare for all you WHY IT IS HARD FOR bitcoin BREAK UP 3700 – 3900$ ???

Trading is my job and I watch market very hours in day by day, you know ? Each action of market has all meaning of that. Which mean blue and red candle occur in this time ? Why is big volume in that candle ? Why break up or why break down ? Which meaning in that break and what happen after that ? And very important thing that which meaning market want to show for us in next step of moving by looking in candles ?

Do you want to know about the action of market in recent time via my viewpoint ? Yes ? So keep read in below.

BUT BEFORE READING HELP ME LIKE THIS POST FOR SUPPORT ME !

Okay so now we will solve and understanding about each signal in this chart I make for all you.

We just consider about the price from 25 November up to now guys.

Look at 25 Nov – 27 Nov, what you see in here ? Double Bottom Pattern ? Clearly for buy ? Why you did not buy ?

When the market bounce up from Double Bottom many people think that this is really a signal for middle – term bounce back because we have not any official bounce back from the crazy crash when we break down 57xx$. But what happen after that ? The price can not break up neck line of this pattern in A point. The price correction down to B point.

And in here at that day I predict it has went up to 45xx$ -47xx$ ( C point as predict ) but what happen ? We can not break up by the stronger of bear and fear psychology.

From here we have Downtrend Parallel Channel . In 6th Dec , we officially break down the major support 36xx$ and very fast after that we also break down Parallel Channel with panic zone of selling from market.

We can not break up neck line which is normal way but why did not ? And also has recent panic sell so what do you think about the market right now ? Bear is clearly so do you believe that bitcoin can break up 3600 – 3900$ ? With me that is hard for us.

Take some criteria in here for next.

After Panic sell we also have Double Bottom Pattern and put the price go up but look at the volume ? It is lower than before so do you think it is good for going up ? We will see bear soon.

Also look at Visible Range of Volume we all see the volume in 3600 – 3900$ is big so many investor they buy in high so they will sell when the price come here.

For more detail, research about Session Volume of each time period that we all see high volume for accumulation before dump very strong. Also clearly with some big red column of volume will give you evidence bearish market.

DMI 4C show for us Bullish is weaker

RSI in Bearish Flag Pattern so we just go up for little before reached overbuy zone and next bear will come!

So what about the target. That is my prediction – not recommend for buy and sell so remember !

The target for next term is 33xx$ ( the last Double bottome zone ) or 2800 – 3000$ is bottom zone as LEGENDARY ANALYSIS.

Thank for reading and hope all you can get some helpful information in here !

LIKE & SHARE for support me !

Published at Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:16:23 +0000

Previous Article

Local Community in Belgium wants to Unite all Positive Forces with Province-wide LumbU coin

Next Article

Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH Bullish Above $98 and Bearish Below $88

You might be interested in …

Gold reward token new crypto coin overview

Gold Reward Token New Crypto Coin Overview

Gold Reward Token New Crypto Coin Overview GRX is a multipurpose cryptocurrency based on the Ethereum blockchain framework. It is ERC20 compliant and compatible with existing ERC20 wallets. Essentially GRX will be used in fulfilling […]

Core dev maxwell: uasf ‘does not measure up to standard’

Core Dev Maxwell: UASF ‘Does Not Measure Up To Standard’

bitcoin core developer Greg Maxwell has newly outlined why he “does not support” a user-activated soft fork (UASF) as it figures in BIP 148.


Maxwell: UASF ‘Guarantees Disruption’

In a circular to the Core mailing list Friday, Maxwell said that although he is not strictly against a soft fork, its incarnation in BIP 148’s UASF does not “really measure up to the standard set by segwit itself.”

The debate over whether to galvanize the entire bitcoin ecosystem into Segwit activation via a UASF has gained considerable traction over the last month.

Proponents say it is the quickest way to move bitcoin on from its current stalemate, yet detractors highlight its disruptive nature as a reason for caution. If a UASF occurred, for example, non-supportive miners would find their blocks invalid after the deadline, and would not receive rewards for their work.

Maxwell too notes that this “disruption” is a key difference between a UASF and segwit activation via miners.

“The primary flaw in BIP148 is that by forcing the activation of the existing (non-UASF segwit) nodes it almost guarantees at a minor level of disruption,” he continued. “Segwit was carefully engineered so that older unmodified miners could continue operating _completely_ [sic] without interruption after segwit activates.”

 

Time Still Not Of The Essence

Despite the increasingly slow and expensive nature of the bitcoin network, Maxwell still advocates a measured approach without speed as a priority.

…The fastest support should not be our goal, as a community– there is always some reckless altcoin or centralized system that can support something faster than we can– trying to match that would only erode our distinguishing value in being well engineered and stable.

First do no harm.’ We should use the least disruptive mechanisms available, and the BIP148 proposal does not meet that test.

The developer has meanwhile found himself under fire lately from bitcoin Unlimited proponents, notably Roger Ver, who released a dedicated presentation with quotes from Maxwell highlighting alleged errors.

“It’s important the users not be at the mercy of any one part of the ecosystem to the extent that we can avoid it– be it developers, exchanges, chat forums, or mining hardware makers,” Maxwell concluded.

Ultimately the rules of bitcoin work because they’re enforced by the users collectively– that is what makes bitcoin bitcoin, it’s what makes it something people can count on: the rules aren’t easy to just change.

Meanwhile, bitcoin’s recent price spike over $1,200 has been attributed by some to a sharp rise in the number of UASF-signaling nodes. Though this does not necessarily imply causation, the price has also dipped following the publication of Maxwell’s post.

What do you think about Greg Maxwell’s perspective on a UASF? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of uasf.org, twitter.com, shutterstock

The post Core Dev Maxwell: UASF ‘Does Not Measure Up To Standard’ appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.