January 25, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Bitcoin recovering from the Sledgehammer, Fractal or?

Bitcoin recovering from the sledgehammer, fractal or?

Bitcoin recovering from the Sledgehammer, Fractal or?

Volume on the dump was not sell-off high but it was high. As the whole market has been doing during the rally, it has done the same with this drop, following ETH’. I wrote a whole story about it in my previous analysis and i will try to do a follow up on that theory if i can find the time. I showed a few options in the previous analysis and so far it has been following this fractal and actually also still following the original chart from the previous analysis. Even though i favored a break up and gave several reasons for it, we broke an important support level ( bullish momentum) around 4000/3950 and just dumped big time. Broke the 3800/50 support like a hot knife through butter. Because of the high volume , the size and the break of that support, i mentioned it was likely to see another drop. What i hoped for was however, a smaller drop than the previous one, suggesting a low might be closing in and keeping the higher low pattern alive. But instead we got a similar size drop which is usually a bad sign. A few hours before the drop, i did gave a warning about bitcoin [BTC]’ and ETH’, because of the low volume of BTC’ (easy to manipulate but also low buy pressure) and the bearish movement of ETH’. It was just that most of the alts were making (small) breakouts, that things looked quite good. This shows again how important volume is in this game.

I don’t like the fact that we dropped to 3500, because that took away the bullish trend the market had build the past month. This because it broke the previous low at 3600 from around Christmas. That red zone on the left, is an important zone to watch. Because IMO that shows the difference between the bulls and bears. If the market is not able to really break that zone, it could become very bearish . So i think a break is necessary to get the pressure off from the bears. Otherwise i am afraid we could see a pattern like we had since the Feb low at 6K. Forming lower highs (11.7K/10K/8.5K/7.4K), showing each time money is flowing away from this market.

Before getting to bearish , that even though my first thought since the 3200 low was a much faster move up to the 4200/5200 levels, there was a more healthier option. This was making a much more solid foundation for the market around the 3200/3500 area. The meaning of this would be, that if we would drop to these levels again, buyers start to enter the market again. So in other words, each time price gets to that range again, an army of bulls show up to buy everything up again. This would be a much better foundation long term than the inverse H&S i assumed at the start of the rally.

Short term, the blue line on the right is a realistic option. Assuming the current bull flag will fail, since that happens 70/80% of the times the past half half year. If the bulls can keep it above the 3640, it could work out. But i think, even if we get a push up here, we will make a correction down again to test the possible new support at 3500/3600. At the moment i don’t have a bigger picture plan, so i will keep watching this from the sidelines until i get a clearer picture. If we get something like the blue line, i will probably get in again. I would keep an eye out on ETH, because the 112/113 is a very important level there. A break of that level, might indicate the bears have taken over again.
As things develop, i will try to give a better indication of the direction for the coming weeks.

Please don’t forget to give a like if you appreciate this 🙂

Previous analysis:

Published at Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:34:13 +0000

Previous Article

MAHAbfic (Maharashtra – Blockchain, Fintech, ICO, Crypto currency) Pune Feb 2nd and 3rd, 2019

Next Article

Code is Not the Law: Blockchain Contracts and Artificial Intelligence

You might be interested in …

Adam Back to Jihan Wu: SegWit Not ‘Complicated,’ Fixes Satoshi’s Bug

Hashcash inventor Adam Back has said Segregated Witness (SegWit) “fixes” an original bug in bitcoin from creator Satoshi Nakamoto.


Back: SegWit ‘Fixes Satoshi Bug’

As part of a Twitter exchange Friday, Back rebuffed criticism from bitcoin Unlimited proponent Jihan Wu, demonstrating how SegWit is beneficial to the virtual currency’s core protocol.

Wu, who is a co-founder of mining conglomerate Bitmain, had said that the technology would make the network “more complicated.”

adam-back

“SegWit is not more complicated,” Back wrote.

“It fixes Satoshi’s bug that txid=H(tx,sig) to txid=H(tx) this is not complicated, and it is necessary to fix.”

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

What’s more, if implemented, SegWit can can actually help reduce the so-called “technical debt” burden of complicated code albeit having its own tradeoffs, which are assessed here.

The segwit code has been heavily reviewed, which helps resist the introduction of technical debt at both a code and design level…Segwit has multiple independent reimplementations, which helps discover any unnecessary complexity and technical debt at the point that it can still be avoided.

SegWit: Complicated & Straightforward

Wu’s stance echoes a broader opinion from the Chinese community in particular that SegWit creates unnecessary complexity within bitcoin.

In an interview with Bitcoinist this month, for example, Leon Liu, CEO of P2P trading service Bitkan, said that this was a reason why the technology “is not the best solution for bitcoin scaling.”

“Segwit will not be the best solution for bitcoin scaling, it will make the bitcoin network more complicated,” he stated.

At the same time, efforts have been made to allay such fears, Blocktrail CTO Ruben De Vries commenting last year that SegWit “is not very complicated if you already know the ins and outs of the bitcoin protocol.”

segregated-witness

Back meanwhile has praised attempts at educating the wider community on the nature of scaling solutions without resorting to ‘political’ siding.

An explainer on SegWit by Andreas Antonopoulos garnered considerable praise, Back describing it as “the best he’d seen on the topic.”

On its benefits, Antonopoulos wrote in the blog post, which originally came out in August last year:

“Firstly, segregated witness reduces the overall cost of transactions by discounting witness data and increasing the capacity of the bitcoin blockchain.

“Secondly, segregated witness’ discount on witness data corrects a misalignment of incentives that may have inadvertently created more bloat in the UTXO set.”

Litecoin Bounce on SegWit Rumors?

SegWit is traditionally considered ‘complicated’ compared to merely increasing the bitcoin block size, despite the latter requiring a hard fork of the virtual currency.

Currently, the proposal is still behind bitcoin Unlimited though both need at least 95% to activate.

12121212

Outside the bitcoin debate, rumors surfacing that Litecoin is to activate SegWit may have led to a surprise expansion in value of the altcoin by around 30%.

What do you think about the contrasting opinions on SegWit? Will it add complexity to bitcoin? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Twitter

The post Adam Back to Jihan Wu: SegWit Not ‘Complicated,’ Fixes Satoshi’s Bug appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Re: fuzzballs [released]

Re: FuzzBalls [Released]

Re: FuzzBalls [Released] isee FUZZBALLS added to coinmarketcap http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/fuzzballs/ current supply 2,895,125 FUZZ btw i added some of the (prototype) keychains at cryptopia’s marketplace that are available like theseKeychain/Openers:bitcoin-Litecoin-Dogecoin-Feathercoin-Sexcoin(no opening oops )Keychains:rest lolSo you can […]