May 3, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Bitcoin Price Not Correlated to Futures Expiration Dates: Research

Bitcoin price not correlated to futures expiration dates: research

Bitcoin Price Not Correlated to Futures Expiration Dates: Research


Bitcoin price
Advertisement

The common idea that the bitcoin price drops just before the cryptocurrency futures contracts expire has no solid basis, a new study published by Cindicator suggests.

The report, titled Bitcoin Futures: Market Evolution, studied bitcoin volumes on futures and spot cryptocurrency exchanges to get an idea about the liquidity and development of the holistic trading market. It initially found the presence of institutional investors in the future markets, analyzed their past positions on the futures, compared them to the bitcoin price movements before the future expired.

The analysis is rested on a theory that future markets, with their comparatively lower volume than the spot market, are insufficient catalysts when it comes to predicting bitcoin spot prices. The Cindicator researchers, therefore, opted to study the bitcoin price action every time a future approached its expiration date.

“This is partly because of arbitrageurs trying to gain from differences between futures and spot prices that can be produced by lower liquidity and/or differing demand-supply dynamics of futures and spot investors in the short term,” the researchers explained.

The First Expiry

Last December, CBOE and CME launched bitcoin futures around the same time, with just a week difference between them. The Cindicator report found that the bitcoin price pattern before the first future contract expiry in both the exchanges was similar. The price dropped before each fix and started increasing afterward, similar to the belief that speculators have operated on to date.

Bitcoin price not correlated to futures expiration dates: research
January 2018 — expiries of f8 contracts – the red areas represent the seven-day period before the expiries of cboe futures and the blue ones represent the seven-day period before cme expiries.

“Probably because it was the first expiry, the CBOE futures experienced a spike in intraday hourly return volatilities on expiry,” the report said while citing the pump-and-dump price behavior of bitcoin between January 16 and 17. The CME futures expiry, however, reacted smoothly to a similar pump-and-dump approach that took place between January 21 and 29.

The Next Expiries and Growing Irrelevance of Futures Market

Following that first settlement date, expiries of both the CME and CBOE futures found their relevance fading with respect to the performance of the spot market, even as futures volumes increased. The market players seemingly moved away from the future markets, its arbitrage opportunities, and future price movement dynamics in response to a strong bearish bias. Therefore, the bitcoin price usually fell before the future expires, but didn’t rise back as expected — owing to the then-current selling sentiment.

Cindicator studied the futures patterns with respect to bitcoin spot price until September, finding that their popular correlation couldn’t sustain the mainstream bearish factors seen after January. Every time, mainstream fundamental factors belittled futures market relevance in defining the bitcoin price movements. In May, for instance, the bitcoin price dropped due to a strong bearish bias imposed after the invalidation of strong support at $10,000 — not because futures were approaching their conclusions.

“Regardless, despite the small impact of futures on the trend, it is interesting to note that volatilities picked up before expiries — a price discovery activity signal,” the analysis noted.

Simon Keusen, Head of Analytics at Cindicator, concluded by saying that “there is no golden rule for trading based on futures expiration dates,” but one should be analyzing the overall market trends to get a clearer picture.

“Our conclusions from this research are a good representation of the overall value we seek to provide to crypto investors by presenting different reasons for why certain market movements might happen and encouraging doing research and using analytical tools,” he added.

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Follow us on Telegram or subscribe to our newsletter here.
Join CCN’s crypto community for $9.99 per month, click here.
Want exclusive analysis and crypto insights from Hacked.com? Click here.
Open Positions at CCN: Full Time and Part Time Journalists Wanted.

Advertisement


Published at Thu, 18 Oct 2018 23:10:07 +0000

Previous Article

SEC Sets Up Open Line of Communication for Fintech Projects With FinHub

Next Article

Canadian Cloud Mining Powerhouse Nuvoo Revolutionizes Cloud Mining Industry with a Month-to-Month Contract and 50% Cheaper Rates!

You might be interested in …

Howard Marks Admits ‘Mistake’, Changes Stance on Bitcoin

After previously slamming bitcoin and other digital currencies as “not real”, “fad”, and “a pyramid scheme”, billionaire traditional investor Howard Marks made a spectacular U-turn on his views on the new financial technology in his latest memo to Oaktree Clients.


Howard Marks’ 180 Degree Turn

In his July memo, Howard Marks explored the world of cryptocurrencies and leveled heavy criticism at them. However, after receiving significant backlash from various media outlets for his ‘dinosaur’ views and lack of understanding of the new financial technology, Marks decided to revisit the topic to get ‘enlightened’ and ‘educated’ on the subject. In his new September memo, he claims that bitcoin partisans encouraged him to think of bitcoin as a currency – a medium of exchange – rather than as an investment asset.

The billionaire investor acknowledged his ‘mistake’ as he had been looking at bitcoin the wrong way, and humbly conceded that much of the arguments he made against the cryptocurrency were applicable to the dollar as well. Marks subsequently made the case for qualifying bitcoin as a currency and concluded that although he sees no reason why bitcoin can’t serve as a currency and “become an accepted medium of exchange”, he warned against getting caught up in the hype and buying it with the sole view of making money off it.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Warning Signs

bitcoin’s volatility, which has seen it rise over 350% in 2017 alone, concerned Marks, who was quick to point out that the lack of an upper ceiling for bitcoin which sees limitless appreciation fails to make sense to him. He asks, “Would you sell your house for euros that are said to be worth two or three times as much as the dollar?”

Although this represents a risk averse and extremely conservative outlook, it does provoke thoughts pertaining to long term stability of currencies. Marks also shares his other major concern, that the low barriers to entry give rise to many competing transaction systems. Would bitcoin’s utility as a payment mechanism be hampered if Amazon announced its own? He asks, “Would you rather transact in bitcoin or Amazonians?”

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The Bottom Line on bitcoin

In the new memo, Marks makes it clear that he advocates for bitcoin as a currency and warns against “lottery-ticket thinking”, which seduces people towards the cryptocurrency as it offers the possibility of vast wealth. Although some elements or “seeds for a boom” that contributed to past historical economic bubbles are evident in Bitcoin’s surge, Marks emphatically makes it known that none of them make bitcoin a ‘mistake’. He also mentions that with the existence of tons of cryptocurrencies and the possibility of endless more, the winner will be hard to call.

As evidenced by the hundreds of e-commerce start ups during the tech bubble, most of which ended up worthless, putting all your eggs in one basket might not be the wisest thing to do. Although Marks said that he still considers it a speculative bubble and therefore still doesn’t “feel like putting my money into it”, he also said that he was “willing to be proved wrong.” For such a juggernaut in the field of traditional financial investing, this is as close as anyone can get to singing the praises of the very technology that might be the cause of their own downfall.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

What do you think of Howard Marks’ new memo and shift in position on bitcoin? Do you agree with his bottom line? How would you respond to his apprehensions? Let us know in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Christopher Goodney/Bloomberg

The post Howard Marks Admits ‘Mistake’, Changes Stance on Bitcoin appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Re: У биткоина появился конкурент cloudcoin

Re: У биткоина появился конкурент CLOUDCOIN

Re: У биткоина появился конкурент CLOUDCOIN Ответ Шона. Извините за задержку с ответом.Биткоин тоже контролируется. Вот почему мы слышим о «твердой развилке».С Биткоин побеждает тот, у которого когда-либо больше всего серверов. Сообщается, что китайское правительство […]