November 4, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Bitcoin Price (BTC) Undervalued By Nearly $34K According to Infamous Dickline

Bitcoin price (btc) undervalued by nearly $34k according to infamous dickline

Bitcoin Price (BTC) Undervalued By Nearly $34K According to Infamous Dickline

Bitcoin price (btc) undervalued by nearly $34k according to infamous dickline

bitcoin’s recent bullish rally has helped the leading crypto asset return to mean after $6K support was penetrated by bears. Given its potential, it’s clear to see that Bitcoin is currently undervalued by most analyst’s standards. bitcoin price predictions place the number one crypto by market cap in the hundreds of thousands, with some estimates reaching a staggering $1 million USD.

Such an estimate was made my the eccentric cyber security expert turned crypto influencer John McAfee, who offered to eat his own “dick on national television” if his prediction didn’t come true by the end of the year 2020. Since that bold claim was made, the crypto community has been watching bitcoin price closely, tracking it in accordance with the McAfee “dickline.”  According to the infamous “dickline,” Bitcoin is currently nearly $34K undervalued.

bitcoin Falling Short of Dickline Trajectory to McAfee’s $1M Prediction

Back in July of 2017 before bitcoin price truly went parabolic, founder of anti-virus pioneer McAfee Labs, John McAfee, made a claim that it would reach $500,000 per BTC “within three years.” He later revised his estimate based on a new prediction model due to how quickly the cryptocurrency’s value skyrocketed, and changed it to $1 million by the end of 2020. He also reiterated his commitment to his wager.

Following McAfee’s tweet, the crypto community became so enamored with the wild yet confident prediction that a website was developed called dickline.info that was dedicated to tracking bitcoin’s progress along a plotted 0.484095526% per day growth trajectory that would match up with McAfee’s end goal for BTC.

Related Reading | Bitcoin Bottom Doesn’t Matter, Last Time General Population Can Afford Entire BTC

The infamous “dickline” had been mostly forgotten about as McAfee distracted the world with his antics, which includes a Presidential run in 2020, a crypto-backed fiat currency that adorns his likeness, and his going into exile to avoid paying taxes to the IRS.

However, outspoken cypherpunk and creator of Satoshi.info Jameson Lopp didn’t forget, and recently called attention to how Bitcoin is grossly undervalued according to the “dickline” trajectory.

According to the site, bitcoin price is currently 89.51% below where the leading crypto’s value would need to be to reach $1 million by the end of 2020. For bitcoin to reach such a milestone, it should currently be valued at $37,797 according to the site. The number one crypto by market cap is currently trading at around $3,930 – suggesting that BTC is undervalued by nearly $34K.

Related Reading | John McAfee Interview: ‘Bitcoin Will Become The Gold Standard’

While many believe that bitcoin will indeed reach incredible value if its potential is ever fully realized, a $1 million per BTC prediction may be unreachable as it would put its market cap somewhere around $21 trillion dollars. If it doesn’t reach the lofty goal set by McAfee, crypto enthusiasts will be disappointed bitcoin didn’t reach it, but they’ll surely be tuning in to watch McAfee stay true to his word on national television.

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Published at Sat, 23 Feb 2019 02:00:19 +0000

Previous Article

Despite the numerous commentators and market “experts”, no one can predict and time market downturns with any useful level of reliability

Next Article

Texas Cryptocurrency Businesses Agree to Halt Token Offerings After Cease and Desist

You might be interested in …

NO2X: Next Week’s Hard Fork Has Been “Suspended” Due to a Lack of Consensus

b2xcancel

There will almost certainly be no bitcoin hard fork next week: the main organizers behind the SegWit2x project have “suspended” their efforts.

In an email to the SegWit2x mailing list, one of the main organizers behind the project, BitGo CEO Mike Belshe, explained that the proposed hard fork has not been able to gain sufficient consensus to proceed:

“Although we strongly believe in the need for a larger blocksize, there is something we believe is even more important: keeping the community together. Unfortunately, it is clear that we have not built sufficient consensus for a clean blocksize upgrade at this time.”

The New York Agreement was originally forged between a group of bitcoin companies in May of this year. An initiative by Digital Currency Group CEO Barry Silbert, the project — later dubbed “SegWit2x” — was to combine activation of the Segregated Witness soft fork with a hard fork to double bitcoin’s block weight limit. With Segregated Witness activated on the bitcoin network this past summer, arguably helped by the SegWit2x project, the hard fork was scheduled to take place next week.

However, the hard fork part of the New York Agreement was always controversial for a number of reasons. As a result, a growing number of signatories dropped out of the agreement over the past weeks and months, while developers, user communities, public polls, future markets and more all indicated limited support for the effort. And as the hard fork date drew closer, it become increasingly clear that SegWit2x would in fact spawn a new currency rather than constitute an upgrade of the bitcoin protocol.

And this was never the plan, Belshe wrote:

“Continuing on the current path could divide the community and be a setback to bitcoin’s growth. This was never the goal of Segwit2x.”

Belshe’s email was also signed on behalf of Xapo CEO Wences Casares, Bitmain CEO Jihan Wu, Bloq CEO Jeff Garzik, Blockchain CEO Peter Smith and ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees. In a separate blog post published just before Belshe’s email, BitPay CEO Stephen Pair also called for cancelation of the hard fork.

While the New York Agreement was signed by even more companies (and some individuals), and anyone can still deploy the hard fork, it is unlikely that anyone will proceed with the hard fork in any meaningful way.

Belshe does, however, note that a hard fork to increase bitcoin’s block weight limit might be needed in the future, writing:

“As fees rise on the blockchain, we believe it will eventually become obvious that on-chain capacity increases are necessary. When that happens, we hope the community will come together and find a solution, possibly with a blocksize increase.”

The post NO2X: Next Week’s Hard Fork Has Been “Suspended” Due to a Lack of Consensus appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

Who controls bitcoin? Governance through user consensus

Who Controls Bitcoin? Governance Through User Consensus

The Decentralized Nature of bitcoin Governance ‍and ⁢Its​ Implications bitcoin’s governance stands apart from traditional‍ centralized ‌systems, where control is often vested ⁣in a select group​ of executives or policymakers. Rather, decision-making power is distributed⁣ […]