February 23, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Bitcoin Demand Will Surge if The Chinese Yuan Falls More: BitMEX CEO

Bitcoin demand will surge if the chinese yuan falls more: bitmex ceo

Bitcoin Demand Will Surge if The Chinese Yuan Falls More: BitMEX CEO

Bitcoin demand will surge if the chinese yuan falls more: bitmex ceo

As we reported the other day, evidence is purportedly mounting that Bitcoin and the Chinese Renminbi (RMB), known as the Yuan, are tied to each other. A report from the South China Morning Post recently noted that after Donald Trump, the president of the U.S., announced tariff changes on Chinese imports, BTC began to rally. Simultaneously, the yuan purportedly fell to its lowest level in six months, as China looked to move against Trump.

Garrick Hileman, the head of research at industry startup Blockchain.com, told the SCMP that his team, in fact, sees a “strong inverse correlation” between the two assets. He does add that Blockchain.com can’t be “100% certain that Bitcoin’s recent price increase is being driven by trade tensions”, but subsequently noted that the Yuan has traded inversely to the RMB in the past.

As seen in the Twitter post below, there are some eerie similarities in the charts.

This sentiment was perpetuated on Thursday, with BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes releasing his latest edition of “Crypto Trader Digest”. In the edition, the former institutional investor accentuated that Bitcoin is a monetary asset, and that certain actions between America and China could result in a demand for BTC. He points to the fact that with the mounting trade war and a potential for the People’s Bank of China to tighten credit lines, the Chinese Yuan could continue to lose value against the U.S. dollar. He then concludes:

The OTC market is vibrant, and these venues have found politically acceptable ways to allow buyers and sellers to meet in China. The key number is 7.00. If the PBOC allows the Yuan to break this level, ordinary Zhou’s will scramble to get their hands on Bitcoin and other cryptos. Similar to 2015, a sharp and sudden Yuan depreciation could lead to the beginning of another epic bull market.

He isn’t the only industry exec with this thought process. In a recent Fortune article, Barry Silbert of Digital Currency Group stated that Bitcoin is best seen as a “non-correlated asset”.

Deemed Moot?

Some, however, believe that this analysis is moot.

Macro analyst Alex Krüger recently pointed out that Friday’s sell-off shows that BTC is a hedge against trade wars is “nonsensical”. Citing the fact that the Bitstamp sell-off was practically engineered by one entity, which many speculate was trying to turn a profit on BitMEX, he adds that Bitcoin’s recent parabolic rally likely is a result of “a handful of parties.”

He goes on to joke that the Bitcoin and RMB narrative is just as foolish as those saying that the cryptocurrency is correlated with avocados, which has spiked alongside BTC.

And, BTC hasn’t rallied much, despite mounting trade threats and tariffs from both sides, somewhat disvaluing this theory. But, who knows?

Photo by 郑 无忌 on Unsplash

Published at Sat, 25 May 2019 04:08:51 +0000

Previous Article

Enjincraft: Enjin Brings Blockchain Economies to Minecraft

Next Article

Google Finally Removes 2 Fake Cryptocurrency Wallets From the Play Store

You might be interested in …

Morgan Stanley Analyst: True Price of Bitcoin Could Be Zero

In a recent report sent out to clients, Morgan Stanley analyst James Faucette cautioned that the “true” value of bitcoin might actually be zero.


Zero. Zip. Nada.

The report, titled bitcoin Decrypted, discussed the difficulty in ascribing value to the digital currency, noting that it behaves like neither a currency nor a store-of-value commodity like gold, silver, etc… Examining several key factors, Faucette points out:

  • bitcoin can’t be valued as a currency because it has no associated interest rate;
  • It may be likened to digital gold but, unlike gold itself, which is used in electronics, jewelry, etc.., bitcoin has no inherent use*;
  • While it is technically a payment network, bitcoin is difficult to scale and charges no transaction fee*;
  • bitcoin’s average daily trade volume over the last 30 days is only $3 billion* compared to $5.4 trillion in the FX market;
  • The estimated daily purchase volume for bitcoin is less than $300 million compared to Visa’s $17 billion

Bitcoin acceptance among Top 500 eCommerce Retailers

All of these facts, according to Faucette, underscore the fact that the digital currency has “virtually no acceptance, and shrinking.” In fact, he provides a handy chart (above) to illustrate his statement. Because of this, he maintains that “If nobody accepts the technology for payment then the value would be 0.”

Hold On There, Speed…

I hate to burst your bubble, Mr. Faucette, but some of your facts are…shall we say…less than factual. Mind you, I am no financial analyst, but then you don’t need to be to pick out these errors.

FACT 1bitcoin has no inherent use

This one is a little tricky to refute, but I’ll give it a go. Playing devil’s advocate, let’s say that bitcoin as a cryptocurrency has no inherent use. It’s underlying architecture, the blockchain, has a wide range of applications. I know…”But blockchain and bitcoin are two separate things…” True, but without the blockchain, we wouldn’t have bitcoin to begin with, so one could conceivably argue that – in this instance – they are two sides of the same coin.

bitcoin has other uses too – especially in a socioeconomic sense. Consider the current economic conditions in Venezuela and Zimbabwe. These people have been utterly failed by their respective governments. Inflation is through the roof, their native currency has about as much value as one-ply toilet paper, and people – families – are starving. So where are they turning? bitcoin. People are mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies so that they can survive. That’s pretty useful if you ask me.

Starving Venezuelans Turn to Bitcoin Mining in Desperation

FACT 2bitcoin charges no transaction fee

Um…hello? There is absolutely a transaction fee, and right now, we’re paying it out the wazoo. It’s part of those “scalability issues” you mention in your research report. Now, if by transaction fee, you mean a centralized service provider collecting a fee that goes into its own coffers, then I guess maybe you’re technically correct, but you’ve still missed the point. Kind of like tech support at a software company whose name will not be mentioned here.

FACT 3bitcoin’s average trade volume over the last 30 days is only $3 billion

What rock have you been living under? Go look at the historical data for the last 30 days on CoinMarketCap. It’s okay. I’ll wait. Second column from the right. The one labeled Volume. If you take the average of all 30 days, as of this writing, it works out to $11.8 billion – just a wee bit more than your $3 billion estimate.

Bitcoin average 24hr trade volume

I respect your experience and your financial acumen, Mr. Faucette, and it even looks like we both believe in the same old adage, “Forewarned is forearmed,” but if you’re arming your clients with inaccurate information, what purpose does it serve?

What do you think of Faucette’s claims? Could the true value of bitcoin actually be zero or is this just more wharrgarbl? Let us know in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Morgan Stanley, Reuters

The post Morgan Stanley Analyst: True Price of Bitcoin Could Be Zero appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.