November 10, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

A Small Crypto Coin Is Making Big Claims About a Private Proof-of-Stake

A small crypto coin is making big claims about a private proof-of-stake

A Small Crypto Coin Is Making Big Claims About a Private Proof-of-Stake

A small crypto coin is making big claims about a private proof-of-stake

If any coin is going to fly under the radar, it makes sense for a privacy coin to do so.

Spectre (not be confused with a separate project called SPECTRE), created two crypto tokens – the aptly named spectre token and the xspec token – in 2016, but hasn’t received much notice from the crypto community so far. Sure enough, its tokens rank in the 500s according to data provider CoinMarketCap, with a total market capitalization of $5.7 million – paltry by many crypto standards.

But that might soon change, as the project is taking a growing interest in a technology called staking.

A number of alternative proof-of-stake systems have launched recently (EOS, Tezos, Neo, Tron), with varying degrees of success, though all of which have commanded large market caps buoyed by big investors.

These systems assign the task of verifying blockchain transactions to a certain number of delegates, representatives of sorts which are voted in by the token holders. While token holders don’t necessarily identify themselves, according to Spectre’s pseudonymous founder, Mandica, there’s a huge privacy problem within these systems.

“All the UTXOs [unspent transaction outputs] spent to generate staking transactions are traceable on the blockchain and all the staking transactions can be linked and your balances are visible to anyone who knows how to analyze the blockchain,” Mandica told CoinDesk.

But the Spectre team, which has been tinkering away on various privacy tools for blockchains for the past couple years, thinks it’s found a way to make staking stealthy as well.

While the technology isn’t ready yet, the team hasn’t been reserved about its ambitions.

“From a user point of view you will be able to keep your entire balance of anonymous coins safe from any observer and you will just need to stake your wallet to receive further anonymous coins that nobody can attribute to you,” Mandica said, continuing:

“This is a unique proposition, and no other cryptocurrency, as far as I know, has a system to stake anonymous coins and generate fresh anonymous coins.”

Entropy in open wallets

While the full picture of how this all works isn’t clear yet (the group hasn’t put out a white paper, though, on social channels, it’s promising one soon), the basic premise is borrowed from another privacy-oriented coin: monero, specifically its ring signature technology.

Ring signatures allow anyone in a particular group to sign a transaction, making it impossible to determine exactly which participants’ keys signed the transaction.

But that still leaves the nodes, which aren’t invisible, able to see the transactions. As such, the Spectre team went to work designing a fix.

“The ‘anonymous’ coins are created using stealth address technology and one-time key pairs, and [they] reside on the blockchain as un-linkable UTXOs that can only be spent by proving ownership through the use of ring signatures and key-images based on the Cryptonote protocol,” Mandica said.

While that’s a bit challenging to parse – and the Spectre team was cautious about explaining in too much detail – there are some clues as to what the system entails.

For instance, users that contribute to the network by leaving their wallets connected to the internet can earn a minimum of a 5 percent annual income on their tokens. Although the fewer people that have their wallets open and online, the higher this yield goes (providing an incentive to others to do it).

Mandica declined to explain in detail what these wallets are doing, but he did say that the “proof-of-stealth” algorithm the team is employing is designed to take advantage of the creation of new tokens with no prior history to increase entropy used to mask the true transactions.

He told CoinDesk:

“Entropy is key in a system using ring signatures to create a large pool of mixins or ‘dummy’ coins that can be used in the ring signature protected anonymous transactions.”

Based on other descriptions of ring signature schemes, protocols need a steady stream of unspent transactions to mask the real transactions. And this may be what those open wallets are doing.

Anonymous to the core

According to the team, in its next major release, the new proof-of-stealth staking mechanism for anonymous coins – the spectre coin is the anonymous one – will complement the proof-of-stake version 3 (PoSv3) algorithm the blockchain already uses.

But this work is just the latest privacy-centric tooling the Spectre team has come up with.

Even those without an unusually high privacy consciousness will be familiar with Tor, an acronym for “The Onion Router,” a scheme for masking internet users’ activity online and even accessing sites intentionally invisible to search engines like Google. Spectre has already built Tor into its systems and even went further, implementing Tor product, “OBSF4,” which allows users to skirt national firewalls, such as those in China and Iran.

The team itself functions anonymously too. In fact, a spokesperson for the Spectra team told CoinDesk that the developers themselves don’t even know each other’s real names.

And even though, with this kind of anonymity it would have been easy to just walk away, the team didn’t give up – even when it’s initial coin offering (ICO) flopped and its project was lacking vitality, while all around them crypto projects, some without serious intent, raised millions by selling tokens.

“We started out in 2016 with a very unsuccessful ICO that raised only 16 BTC at a time when the BTC price was around $600-$700, so we didn’t make it far on those funds,” Mandica said.

Spectre did secure private funding (amount undisclosed) earlier this year, but still the project remains just an after-hours project for the team. Instead of building with the monetary encouragement of the free market, Mandica and his team are building because they believe in the mission.

And that mission is all about one of crypto’s favorite ideas: unbridled privacy.

In a newsletter from June, Mandica explains how best to think about the project:

“The best way to understand Spectre today is to think of bitcoin + Proof-of-Stake.v3 + anonymous transactions (using similar technology to monero) + Tor to hide your IP.”

Venetian mask image via Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Published at Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:00:51 +0000

Features

Previous Article

Bitcoin Price Analysis: How Many Days Can We Trade Sideways?

Next Article

Blockchain Open Development Lab @ The DEN

You might be interested in …

THE ADVANTAGE OF BITENNY TO FIGHT A MARKET COMPETITION

THE ADVANTAGE OF BITENNY TO FIGHT A MARKET COMPETITION Transactions for purchasing a product through a network of online and offline stores have a very close correlation with the application of digital tokens and the […]

Bitcoin Companies Supporting SegWit UASF: 12, Opposed: 0

These companies are in favor of SegWit via a User Activated Sof Fork (UASF). No company has opposed it so far.


Who Supports UASF

Lately, there has been a lot of talk regarding the possible activation of a User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) in order to implement the SegWit proposal without the need to reach miner consensus. An early look at the companies that have so far taken a stand in regards to the UASF reveals that nine companies support the SegWit UASF, while two others are ready for it. The list is as follows:

So far, no company has opposed the User Activated Soft Fork, although most companies have yet to input their stance regarding the subject. BitPay, for example, is not included and they have already announced their support for the UASF. During an episode of Let’s Talk Bitcoin! Bitpay CEO Stephen Pair stated:

The most important thing, I think, are the users; I really like the idea of a user-activated soft fork followed by a miner activation.

It is likely that most companies that support the SegWit soft fork or that are ready for it will take the same stance regarding the UASF since it seems to be the only plausible method of activating SegWit.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

With large mining pools like Bitmain supporting Bitcoin Unlimited, it is highly unlikely that SegWit will ever reach the required 95% miner approval threshold unless these pools change their mind on the update. And If the latest accusations regarding the Bitmain’s secret advantage are true, it is unlikely that they’ll even change their stance on SegWit.

What is a UASF?

A User Activated Soft Fork is a soft fork that does not require miner approval but counts instead on the nodes (users) to activate the soft fork themselves. This is done by releasing a new version of a bitcoin Client, in this case, Core. The client gives a block height limit in which the upgrade will become active.

Once the predetermined block height is reached, the nodes that have updated to the new client will stop accepting blocks that don’t support SegWit. Given that SegWit is a soft fork, the nodes that don’t upgrade to the new version of the bitcoin Core client (with UASF) will still count SegWit blocks as valid.

This method makes SegWit much more likely to be adopted when you consider that, currently, more than 83% (5774) of all Bitcoin nodes are running the bitcoin Core client.

If all of these nodes update to the new UASF client, miners will have no choice but to start mining blocks that support SegWit as these will be accepted by all the nodes, rather than only the ones that haven’t updated to the new bitcoin Core client.

UASF Risks

Although the UASF seems like a more effective strategy on paper, it comes with some risks for the community. For example, if the majority of miners don’t start mining SegWit blocks after the UASF is activated, a chain split will take place.

Different nodes will see different blockchains, according to the client they are running. Nodes that have not upgraded to the newest bitcoin Core client will see the blockchain without SegWit and the upgraded nodes will see the blockchain that supports SegWit.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

This scenario is problematic for bitcoin Core, which has gone a long way to ensuring that SegWit could be introduced via soft fork. It would also mean that the blockchain with the majority of users (nodes) would be the most vulnerable one due to the lack of miners.

Another issue with the UASF is that the cost of setting up nodes is not nearly as good of an anti-Sybil system as bitcoin’s Proof of Work is, meaning that certain members of the community could start hosting nodes in order to support a UASF or to offer resistance to it. To some degree, this brings back the issue of economic power centralization that has been previously raised with regards to bitcoin Unlimited.

Will the UASF be successful, bringing SegWit to bitcoin once and for all? Or will something else get in the way once more? Let us know what you think in the comments below.


Images Courtesy of Coin.Dance, Twitter, AdobeStock

The post Bitcoin Companies Supporting SegWit UASF: 12, Opposed: 0 appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.