February 25, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

5 Suspicious Factors about ₿itcoin Exchange QuadrigaCX and its $150m in Missing Crypto

5 suspicious factors about ₿itcoin exchange quadrigacx and its $150m in missing crypto

5 Suspicious Factors about ₿itcoin Exchange QuadrigaCX and its $150m in Missing Crypto

Bloomberg just reported that QuadrigaCX CEO and founder Gerald Cotten legally changed his will just 12 days before his death on December 9. This fact is just the latest in a string of interesting elements regarding the Canadian ₿itcoin exchange’s sudden closure and supposed $150 million in missing crypto funds. Here is a run-down of what we know — and don’t know — so far.

1. Rumors that Co-Founder Michael Patryn Might Be Convicted Identity Thief Omar Dhanani

For over a year, suspicions have circulated that Michael Patryn might actually be a famously convicted scammer by the name of Omar Dhanani. Dhanani was a member of the Shadowcrew and plead guilty to numerous counts of identity fraud back in 2005.

According to lawyer Stephen Palley, Dhanani also used the name Omar Patryn in a forfeiture case. Omar Patryn was also a name used to start a company called Midas Gold Exchange.

Again, these allegations have not been definitely proven. However, Palley added on Twitter:

“If we were in front of a jury, with just this, and the burden was preponderance of the evidence — hard to imagine a jury concluding anything other than that the two people are one and the same, in my personal opinion.”

At a minimum, having an identity thief in the upper echelons of a company that handles people’s personal and financial information is a major problem. QuadrigaCX repeatedly claimed a year ago that Michael Patryn had left the company years before. Nevertheless, the information and proper divulging of it might have foreshadowed the eventual problems the exchange faced. Clearly, not all is well with a company that has such things going on.

2. Past Banking Problems

Bitcoin break piggy bank

This isn’t the first time QuadrigaCX has run into trouble. | Source: Shutterstock

Back in October, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce froze around $22 million in QuadrigaCX funds. The bank claimed it was unable to ascertain the real ownership of the money.

The bank began having issues with QuadrigaCX when several bank wires were recalled.

CIBC was unsure if it should return the money or not, while at the same time it couldn’t be sure if all of the money in the account belonged to Quadriga. It therefore sought help from the courts to determine the best course of action, according to the Globe and Mail.

“CIBC says in court documents that it had received wire recalls from seven of the 388 depositors and was not sure whether to honour the requests. CIBC says it tried to investigate, but was not able to resolve the matter. As a result, the bank is seeking what is known as an “interpleader order,” which would allow it to pay the money into court and have the justice system decide where it should go.”

3. Whether the $150 Million in ‘Missing’ Crypto Actually Exists

As CCN reported over the last week, it’s unclear whether QuadrigaCX actually possessed $150 million in crypto at the time of its closure and/or Cotten’s death. Blockchain analysts have released inconclusive reports, but so far no one has found evidence that the exchange was solvent. Taylor Monahan says that her investigation found that the company definitely didn’t possess a significant enough amount of Ethereum to make it liquid.

Worse, a lot of the funds seem to have moved to external exchanges. If the movements tracked by various blockchain analysts aren’t suspicious, we don’t know what is.

4. ₿itcoin Exchange’s Month-Long Silence Following Founder’s Death

According to a death certificate with a misspelling of Cotten’s name, Gerald Cotten passed away on December 9 in India. His wife claims he was opening an orphanage at the time. Without regard to that, over a full month went by before the exchange began to falter and Cotten’s death was announced by the ₿itcoin exchange.

It’s not surprising that officials in India might have misspelled a Western name. This reporter has repeatedly misspelled Cotten’s name, confusing it for the way that Senator Tom Cotton’s name is spelled.

All the same, the length of time between the death of the CEO and the announcement is suspicious. That it coincides with the faltering of the exchange is even more interesting. The crypto exchange suddenly needs funds that it didn’t need for a month previous to remain solvent? And nobody gets anything as a result?

Indeed, the whole story has yet to be told.

5. Crypto Exec. Gerald Cotten Altered Will Less Than 2 Weeks Before Death

It’s probably common to update your will before going to a foreign country, if you have significant assets. There are several ways to make sure your loved ones can have access to your documents. One is to keep a copy of a master password with access to more important information with your attorney. Another is to trust them while you are alive.

Reportedly, Cotten’s laptop has been difficult to get into. If the funds actually exist, it would seem the founder is more cautious than some examples we’ve seen in the crypto community, like the crypto payments firm employee who sent $5 million in ₿itcoin out by accident.

Nevertheless, traces of Cotten’s digital life are few and far between. His LinkedIn profile is no longer active. We wonder if someone had access to that. And if so, what else has he/she/they had access to?

Everything will come out in the wash. The case brings to mind the mysterious disappearance BitConnect exec John Bigatton’s wife. She disappeared without a trace as the walls came crashing down around Bigatton, leaving open the possibility that she is somewhere off-shore holding funds for Bigatton.

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Published at Tue, 05 Feb 2019 21:54:40 +0000

Previous Article

Classic Brokers VS Crypto Exchanges. Searching For Differences

Next Article

Crypto Exchange Kraken Secures Blockbuster $4 Billion Valuation After $100m Mega Deal

You might be interested in …

家庭事业难两全 海外华人子女监管现"真空"

家庭事业难两全 海外华人子女监管现"真空"

家庭事业难两全 海外华人子女监管现"真空" 监管缺失遭控告据西班牙报纸《莱万特》4月15日报道,日前,马德里一名6岁华人女童被父母独自留在家中时,失足从二楼阳台坠落,身体出现了多处骨折,但所幸没有生命危险。事故发生后不久,女童的父母因监管不当遭受警方调查。在西班牙,擅自留未成年人独自在家已经涉嫌违法。一旦被举报发现,父母很有可能失去对亲生子女的监护权,而孩子将会被送往儿童保护中心等相关机构接受抚养。“其实我对这个新闻并不惊讶,因为这是西班牙的一种普遍现象。”西班牙华人叶雪婷在接受本报采访时表示,“大多数华人并没有意识到把小孩独自放在家里的危险性,他们可能觉得五六岁已经是可以自我管理的年龄,相较于外国人,这想法过于松懈。”不只是西班牙,很多西方国家同样制定了严格的儿童保护法规。美国法律规定,如父母将子女单独留在家中发生意外,当地警察或儿童权利机构人员可能“登门拜访”。在意大利,小学生必须由父母或指定监护人接送。家长如果连续多次不按时接学生回家,司法机构将对家长提出监护权司法诉讼,并有权另外指定学生的监护人。 (Why?) Published at Sun, 23 Apr 2017 08:06:39 +0000 [wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]_MG_5808Satoshi Square, 798 Art Zone www.WorldSustainability.Org www.PeacePlusOne.cn www.SustainabilitySymbol.comBy Philip McMaster PeacePlusOne_!/ on 2014-05-25 15:02:54